PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUWS.L vs. G500.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUWS.L vs. G500.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SUWS.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SUWS.L is traded in USD, while G500.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the G500.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SUWS.L having a 10.37% return and G500.L slightly higher at 10.60%.


SUWS.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
-1.35%
6M
8.12%
YTD
10.37%
1Y
18.55%
3Y*
13.89%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*

G500.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.92%
6M
10.32%
YTD
10.60%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
11.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUWS.L vs. G500.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SUWS.L
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
10.37%14.86%11.22%25.16%-21.20%25.32%24.97%
G500.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
10.60%26.32%22.89%31.47%-28.53%27.78%32.88%

Correlation

The correlation between SUWS.L and G500.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020

0.87

The correlation between SUWS.L and G500.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUWS.L vs. G500.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUWS.L
SUWS.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SUWS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUWS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUWS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SUWS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUWS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

G500.L
G500.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
G500.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
G500.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
G500.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
G500.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
G500.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUWS.L vs. G500.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SUWS.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SUWS.LG500.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

1.82

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.87

6.85

+1.02

SUWS.L vs. G500.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUWS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the G500.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUWS.L and G500.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SUWS.L vs. G500.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUWS.L drawdown since its inception was -31.97%, smaller than the maximum G500.L drawdown of -39.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUWS.L and G500.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUWS.LG500.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.97%

-39.54%

+7.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

-12.56%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.81%

-17.75%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.06%

-39.54%

+10.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-0.10%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.56%

-8.08%

+2.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

3.34%

-0.85%

Volatility

SUWS.L vs. G500.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SUWS.L) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg) (G500.L) at 3.57%. This indicates that SUWS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than G500.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUWS.LG500.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

3.57%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.41%

11.66%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.94%

14.98%

-1.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.40%

20.37%

-3.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.85%

20.09%

-3.24%

SUWS.L vs. G500.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUWS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than G500.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUWS.L vs. G500.L - Dividend Comparison

SUWS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, while G500.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
G500.L
Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SUWS.L
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.20%1.21%1.41%1.52%1.71%1.20%1.21%1.70%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUWS.L and G500.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, G500.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

G500.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SUWS.L.

SUWS.L tracks iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while G500.L tracks Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (GBP Hdg). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SUWS.L and 0.05% for G500.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUWS.L and G500.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer