PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUWG.L vs. MVEW.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUWG.L vs. MVEW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SUWG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUWG.L achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly higher than MVEW.L's 0.37% return.


SUWG.L

1D
0.39%
1M
4.00%
YTD
10.28%
6M
10.19%
1Y
21.97%
3Y*
13.08%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*

MVEW.L

1D
0.20%
1M
2.18%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.12%
1Y
3.76%
3Y*
6.64%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUWG.L vs. MVEW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SUWG.L
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
10.28%7.24%12.94%18.32%-11.70%27.80%
MVEW.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.37%3.73%12.44%4.00%-0.60%22.62%

Correlation

The correlation between SUWG.L and MVEW.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between SUWG.L and MVEW.L has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SUWG.L vs. MVEW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SUWG.L
MVEW.L

Technology

32.7%
22.6%

Financial Services

16.6%
15.2%

Industrials

11.2%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
5.4%

Healthcare

9.0%
14.9%

Communication Services

7.7%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
10.2%

Basic Materials

3.8%
1.5%

Real Estate

2.2%
1.4%

Utilities

1.7%
6.7%

Energy

-

3.3%

Technology

SUWG.L
32.7%
MVEW.L
22.6%

Financial Services

SUWG.L
16.6%
MVEW.L
15.2%

Industrials

SUWG.L
11.2%
MVEW.L
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SUWG.L
9.1%
MVEW.L
5.4%

Healthcare

SUWG.L
9.0%
MVEW.L
14.9%

Communication Services

SUWG.L
7.7%
MVEW.L
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

SUWG.L
6.0%
MVEW.L
10.2%

Basic Materials

SUWG.L
3.8%
MVEW.L
1.5%

Real Estate

SUWG.L
2.2%
MVEW.L
1.4%

Utilities

SUWG.L
1.7%
MVEW.L
6.7%

Energy

SUWG.L

-

MVEW.L
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUWG.L vs. MVEW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUWG.L
SUWG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
SUWG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUWG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUWG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SUWG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUWG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

MVEW.L
MVEW.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVEW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUWG.L vs. MVEW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SUWG.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUWG.LMVEW.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.07

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

0.56

+2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

1.47

+8.82

SUWG.L vs. MVEW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUWG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the MVEW.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUWG.L and MVEW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUWG.LMVEW.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

0.41

+1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.68

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.60

+0.25

Drawdowns

SUWG.L vs. MVEW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUWG.L drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, which is greater than MVEW.L's maximum drawdown of -10.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUWG.L and MVEW.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUWG.LMVEW.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.97%

-10.07%

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.92%

-5.85%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-9.04%

-9.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.97%

-10.07%

-8.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.02%

+3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.31%

-2.57%

-1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

2.22%

-0.10%

Volatility

SUWG.L vs. MVEW.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (SUWG.L) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc) (MVEW.L) at 2.63%. This indicates that SUWG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVEW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUWG.LMVEW.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

2.63%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

5.97%

+2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.38%

8.00%

+3.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.65%

9.78%

+3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.63%

10.08%

+3.55%

SUWG.L vs. MVEW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUWG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MVEW.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

SUWG.L vs. MVEW.L - Dividend Comparison

SUWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, while MVEW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MVEW.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Minimum Volatility ESG UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SUWG.L
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.12%1.21%1.38%1.54%1.69%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUWG.L and MVEW.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SUWG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SUWG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MVEW.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SUWG.L and 0.30% for MVEW.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUWG.L and MVEW.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer