SUUS.L vs. USFM.L
SUUS.L (iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and USFM.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from iShares and UBS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUUS.L returned 12.42%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for USFM.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SUUS.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for USFM.L.
Performance
SUUS.L vs. USFM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUUS.L achieves a 14.16% return, which is significantly higher than USFM.L's 12.16% return.
SUUS.L
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 6.64%
- YTD
- 14.16%
- 6M
- 14.29%
- 1Y
- 25.89%
- 3Y*
- 14.75%
- 5Y*
- 12.42%
- 10Y*
- —
USFM.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 12.16%
- 6M
- 12.28%
- 1Y
- 24.78%
- 3Y*
- 16.00%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- —
SUUS.L vs. USFM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUUS.L iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 14.16% | 3.44% | 15.85% | 17.58% | -8.97% | 32.89% | 21.52% | 27.36% | 2.89% | 12.06% |
USFM.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 12.16% | 5.73% | 20.11% | 10.47% | -3.22% | 26.12% | 10.79% | 25.56% | -0.38% | 11.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUUS.L and USFM.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2017 | 0.92 |
The correlation between SUUS.L and USFM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SUUS.L vs. USFM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SUUS.L
USFM.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
-
Technology
SUUS.L
USFM.L
Financial Services
SUUS.L
USFM.L
Consumer Cyclical
SUUS.L
USFM.L
Communication Services
SUUS.L
USFM.L
Healthcare
SUUS.L
USFM.L
Industrials
SUUS.L
USFM.L
Consumer Defensive
SUUS.L
USFM.L
Basic Materials
SUUS.L
USFM.L
Real Estate
SUUS.L
USFM.L
Utilities
SUUS.L
USFM.L
Energy
SUUS.L
-
USFM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUUS.L vs. USFM.L — Risk / Return Rank
SUUS.L
USFM.L
SUUS.L vs. USFM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUUS.L | USFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.46 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 4.51 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.20 | 16.06 | -3.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUUS.L | USFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.61 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.88 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.84 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
SUUS.L vs. USFM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUUS.L drawdown since its inception was -24.56%, smaller than the maximum USFM.L drawdown of -27.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUUS.L and USFM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUUS.L | USFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.56% | -27.52% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.22% | -5.47% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.62% | -17.40% | -4.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.62% | -17.40% | -4.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.54% | -3.49% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 1.54% | +0.58% |
Volatility
SUUS.L vs. USFM.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.55% compared to UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (USFM.L) at 2.78%. This indicates that SUUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUUS.L | USFM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.55% | 2.78% | +0.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.46% | 6.77% | +1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.52% | 9.46% | +2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 13.21% | +1.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.69% | 15.32% | +0.37% |
SUUS.L vs. USFM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUUS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than USFM.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SUUS.L vs. USFM.L - Dividend Comparison
SUUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USFM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUUS.L iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFM.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI USA Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 1.07% | 1.20% | 1.14% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.01% | 1.34% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUUS.L and USFM.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SUUS.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SUUS.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for USFM.L.
Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SUUS.L and 0.25% for USFM.L.
Find the right allocation for SUUS.L and USFM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer