SUUS.L vs. HSUS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SUUS.L (iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and HSUS.L (HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, from iShares and HSBC respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUUS.L returned 12.42%/yr vs 14.14%/yr for HSUS.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SUUS.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for HSUS.L.

Performance

SUUS.L vs. HSUS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L) and HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SUUS.L is traded in GBp, while HSUS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HSUS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SUUS.L having a 14.16% return and HSUS.L slightly higher at 14.52%.

SUUS.L

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 6.64%
• YTD: 14.16%
• 6M: 14.29%
• 1Y: 25.89%
• 3Y*: 14.75%
• 5Y*: 12.42%
• 10Y*: —

HSUS.L

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 8.65%
• YTD: 14.52%
• 6M: 15.61%
• 1Y: 36.29%
• 3Y*: 18.49%
• 5Y*: 14.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUUS.L vs. HSUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SUUS.L iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	14.16%	3.44%	15.85%	17.58%	-8.97%	32.89%	13.83%
HSUS.L HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD	14.52%	10.79%	21.83%	15.09%	-7.73%	29.76%	11.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SUUS.L and HSUS.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2020	0.91

The correlation between SUUS.L and HSUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

SUUS.L vs. HSUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SUUS.L	HSUS.L
Technology	41.6%	45.5%
Financial Services	11.8%	14.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	8.2%
Communication Services	9.1%	6.5%
Healthcare	8.6%	13.8%
Industrials	8.1%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	2.0%
Basic Materials	2.5%	4.0%
Real Estate	2.1%	0.6%
Utilities	1.5%	0.2%
Energy	-	2.2%

Return for Risk

SUUS.L vs. HSUS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUUS.L

SUUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
SUUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
SUUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SUUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 68
SUUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
SUUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

HSUS.L

HSUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 93
HSUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
HSUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
HSUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 93
HSUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
HSUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUUS.L vs. HSUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L) and HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SUUS.L	HSUS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	3.49	-1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.10	4.69	-1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.64	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	6.41	-2.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.20	22.69	-10.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SUUS.L vs. HSUS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is lower than the HSUS.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUUS.L and HSUS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SUUS.L	HSUS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	3.49	-1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	1.03	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	1.09	-0.14

Drawdowns

SUUS.L vs. HSUS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUUS.L drawdown since its inception was -24.56%, which is greater than HSUS.L's maximum drawdown of -20.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUUS.L and HSUS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUUS.L	HSUS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.56%	-20.92%	-3.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.22%	-5.63%	-1.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.62%	-20.92%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.62%	-20.92%	-0.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.54%	-3.18%	-0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	1.59%	+0.53%

Volatility

SUUS.L vs. HSUS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUUS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.55% compared to HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L) at 2.97%. This indicates that SUUS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SUUS.L	HSUS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.55%	2.97%	+0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.46%	7.46%	+1.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.52%	10.36%	+1.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.61%	13.77%	+0.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.69%	14.20%	+1.49%

SUUS.L vs. HSUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUUS.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than HSUS.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SUUS.L vs. HSUS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SUUS.L nor HSUS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SUUS.L and HSUS.L in my portfolio?

SUUS.L and HSUS.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SUUS.L or HSUS.L?

On fees, HSUS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SUUS.L or HSUS.L?

HSUS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SUUS.L.

What is the main difference between SUUS.L and HSUS.L?

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SUUS.L and 0.12% for HSUS.L.