SUSW.L vs. XMJP.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SUSW.L (iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and XMJP.L (Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - SUSW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XMJP.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUSW.L returned 10.52%/yr vs 10.08%/yr for XMJP.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

SUSW.L vs. XMJP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SUSW.L is traded in EUR, while XMJP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XMJP.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSW.L achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly lower than XMJP.L's 17.49% return.

SUSW.L

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 5.87%
• YTD: 11.31%
• 6M: 11.72%
• 1Y: 18.68%
• 3Y*: 12.95%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: —

XMJP.L

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 6.06%
• YTD: 17.49%
• 6M: 16.73%
• 1Y: 30.64%
• 3Y*: 15.46%
• 5Y*: 10.08%
• 10Y*: 9.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSW.L vs. XMJP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SUSW.L iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)	11.31%	1.89%	18.34%	20.78%	-16.40%	35.65%	10.76%	32.32%	-3.09%	2.02%
XMJP.L Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C	17.49%	11.36%	14.41%	16.29%	-11.88%	8.75%	6.24%	21.64%	-9.77%	2.34%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSW.L and XMJP.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2017	0.63

The correlation between SUSW.L and XMJP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SUSW.L vs. XMJP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SUSW.L	XMJP.L
Technology	30.6%	19.1%
Financial Services	17.1%	17.5%
Industrials	11.8%	26.0%
Healthcare	9.3%	6.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	12.2%
Communication Services	7.7%	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	6.2%	3.6%
Basic Materials	4.0%	3.0%
Real Estate	2.3%	2.3%
Utilities	1.8%	1.1%
Energy	-	1.1%

Return for Risk

SUSW.L vs. XMJP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSW.L

SUSW.L Risk / Return Rank: 46
SUSW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
SUSW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
SUSW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
SUSW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
SUSW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 52

XMJP.L

XMJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 59
XMJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
XMJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
XMJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 59
XMJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
XMJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSW.L vs. XMJP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SUSW.L	XMJP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	1.65	-0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.49	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.31	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	3.02	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.66	9.82	-1.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SUSW.L vs. XMJP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSW.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the XMJP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSW.L and XMJP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SUSW.L	XMJP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	1.65	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.60	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.32	+0.44

Drawdowns

SUSW.L vs. XMJP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSW.L drawdown since its inception was -32.09%, smaller than the maximum XMJP.L drawdown of -46.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSW.L and XMJP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUSW.L	XMJP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.09%	-46.05%	+13.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.80%	-10.08%	+2.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.13%	-16.85%	-4.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.13%	-19.11%	-2.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.35%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-11.07%	+6.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	3.11%	-0.97%

Volatility

SUSW.L vs. XMJP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L) is 3.49%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF 1C (XMJP.L) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that SUSW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMJP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SUSW.L	XMJP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.49%	3.89%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.12%	14.88%	-5.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.26%	18.51%	-6.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.61%	16.70%	-2.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.23%	16.48%	-0.25%

SUSW.L vs. XMJP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SUSW.L and XMJP.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SUSW.L vs. XMJP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SUSW.L nor XMJP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SUSW.L and XMJP.L in my portfolio?

SUSW.L and XMJP.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SUSW.L or XMJP.L?

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SUSW.L or XMJP.L?

SUSW.L and XMJP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

What is the main difference between SUSW.L and XMJP.L?

SUSW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while XMJP.L is Japan Equities. SUSW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while XMJP.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers.