PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSW.L vs. USTY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUSW.L vs. USTY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L) and SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SUSW.L is traded in EUR, while USTY.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USTY.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSW.L achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly higher than USTY.L's 1.56% return.


SUSW.L

1D
0.22%
1M
3.92%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.35%
1Y
18.73%
3Y*
12.95%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*

USTY.L

1D
0.12%
1M
0.95%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.17%
1Y
3.24%
3Y*
1.06%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*
1.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSW.L vs. USTY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUSW.L
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
11.31%1.89%18.34%20.78%-16.40%35.65%10.76%32.32%-3.09%2.02%
USTY.L
SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
1.57%-5.12%8.35%0.72%-6.73%5.59%-1.11%10.83%5.90%-2.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSW.L and USTY.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2017

-0.04

The correlation between SUSW.L and USTY.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.13 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUSW.L vs. USTY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSW.L
SUSW.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SUSW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

USTY.L
USTY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
USTY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USTY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
USTY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
USTY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
USTY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSW.L vs. USTY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L) and SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUSW.LUSTY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.09

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

0.82

+1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.66

2.10

+6.57

SUSW.L vs. USTY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSW.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the USTY.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSW.L and USTY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUSW.LUSTY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

0.53

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.15

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.18

+0.58

Drawdowns

SUSW.L vs. USTY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSW.L drawdown since its inception was -32.09%, which is greater than USTY.L's maximum drawdown of -16.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSW.L and USTY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSW.LUSTY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.09%

-16.87%

-15.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.80%

-3.92%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.13%

-11.33%

-9.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.13%

-12.95%

-8.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.53%

+9.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-8.01%

+3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

1.54%

+0.60%

Volatility

SUSW.L vs. USTY.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SUSW.L) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L) at 1.71%. This indicates that SUSW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USTY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUSW.LUSTY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

1.71%

+1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.12%

4.41%

+4.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.26%

6.06%

+6.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

8.50%

+6.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.23%

8.57%

+7.66%

SUSW.L vs. USTY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSW.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than USTY.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUSW.L vs. USTY.L - Dividend Comparison

SUSW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USTY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SUSW.L
iShares MSCI World SRI UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USTY.L
SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.87%4.61%3.81%2.81%1.57%1.31%2.49%2.79%2.11%2.11%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUSW.L and USTY.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USTY.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USTY.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SUSW.L.

SUSW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while USTY.L is Government Bonds. SUSW.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while USTY.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SUSW.L and 0.05% for USTY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUSW.L and USTY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer