PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUSD.L vs. ACWI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUSD.L vs. ACWI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUSD.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUSD.L achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI.L's 11.83% return. Over the past 10 years, SUSD.L has underperformed ACWI.L with an annualized return of 3.36%, while ACWI.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.49% annualized return.


SUSD.L

1D
0.05%
1M
1.52%
YTD
1.34%
6M
0.80%
1Y
5.70%
3Y*
2.52%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*
3.36%

ACWI.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
3.77%
YTD
11.83%
6M
11.80%
1Y
30.06%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
13.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUSD.L vs. ACWI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUSD.L
SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
1.34%-1.69%7.18%-0.46%9.68%1.10%-0.39%1.34%7.32%-7.71%
ACWI.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
11.83%14.32%19.66%15.59%-8.59%20.28%11.89%21.92%-4.58%12.93%

Correlation

The correlation between SUSD.L and ACWI.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2013

0.22

The correlation between SUSD.L and ACWI.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (5 years) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SUSD.L vs. ACWI.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SUSD.L
ACWI.L

Financial Services

30.0%
16.5%

Healthcare

6.0%
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

4.9%
9.3%

Technology

4.8%
29.2%

Industrials

3.9%
10.9%

Utilities

3.1%
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
4.9%

Energy

2.7%
4.3%

Communication Services

2.4%
9.0%

Real Estate

2.1%
1.7%

Basic Materials

0.9%
3.6%

Financial Services

SUSD.L
30.0%
ACWI.L
16.5%

Healthcare

SUSD.L
6.0%
ACWI.L
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SUSD.L
4.9%
ACWI.L
9.3%

Technology

SUSD.L
4.8%
ACWI.L
29.2%

Industrials

SUSD.L
3.9%
ACWI.L
10.9%

Utilities

SUSD.L
3.1%
ACWI.L
2.7%

Consumer Defensive

SUSD.L
2.9%
ACWI.L
4.9%

Energy

SUSD.L
2.7%
ACWI.L
4.3%

Communication Services

SUSD.L
2.4%
ACWI.L
9.0%

Real Estate

SUSD.L
2.1%
ACWI.L
1.7%

Basic Materials

SUSD.L
0.9%
ACWI.L
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUSD.L vs. ACWI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUSD.L
SUSD.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
SUSD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUSD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUSD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SUSD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUSD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWI.L
ACWI.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ACWI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUSD.L vs. ACWI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUSD.L) and SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUSD.LACWI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.55

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

4.28

-3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.31

17.31

-14.00

SUSD.L vs. ACWI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUSD.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the ACWI.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUSD.L and ACWI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUSD.LACWI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

2.89

-2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.96

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.94

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.81

-0.40

Drawdowns

SUSD.L vs. ACWI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUSD.L drawdown since its inception was -15.18%, smaller than the maximum ACWI.L drawdown of -25.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUSD.L and ACWI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUSD.LACWI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.18%

-25.44%

+10.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.27%

-7.05%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.03%

-18.07%

+9.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.18%

-18.07%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.18%

-25.44%

+10.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.84%

-0.41%

-3.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-3.67%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.74%

-0.11%

Volatility

SUSD.L vs. ACWI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUSD.L) is 1.75%, while SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (ACWI.L) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that SUSD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUSD.LACWI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.75%

2.90%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.50%

7.75%

-3.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.19%

10.42%

-4.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.17%

13.05%

-4.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.23%

14.39%

-5.16%

SUSD.L vs. ACWI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUSD.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SUSD.L vs. ACWI.L - Dividend Comparison

SUSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, while ACWI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWI.L
SPDR MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SUSD.L
SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
4.60%4.91%4.20%3.11%1.14%1.80%2.77%2.57%1.66%1.74%1.28%1.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUSD.L and ACWI.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SUSD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SUSD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ACWI.L.

SUSD.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while ACWI.L is Global Equities. SUSD.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD, while ACWI.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SUSD.L and 0.40% for ACWI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUSD.L and ACWI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer