PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SURI vs. SPAQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SURI vs. SPAQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Propel Opportunities ETF (SURI) and Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SURI achieves a 6.10% return, which is significantly higher than SPAQ's 2.81% return.


SURI

1D
-1.15%
1M
-2.84%
YTD
6.10%
6M
3.98%
1Y
32.89%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
10Y*

SPAQ

1D
0.00%
1M
1.51%
YTD
2.81%
6M
1.64%
1Y
4.98%
3Y*
5.87%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SURI vs. SPAQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SURI
Simplify Propel Opportunities ETF
6.10%28.32%-13.34%-2.87%
SPAQ
Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF
2.81%7.35%4.33%4.82%

Correlation

The correlation between SURI and SPAQ is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2023

0.08

SURI vs. SPAQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SURI
SPAQ

Healthcare

56.4%

-

Energy

43.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

91.6%

Industrials

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

SURI
56.4%
SPAQ

-

Energy

SURI
43.6%
SPAQ

-

Basic Materials

SURI

-

SPAQ

-

Communication Services

SURI

-

SPAQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

SURI

-

SPAQ

-

Consumer Defensive

SURI

-

SPAQ

-

Financial Services

SURI

-

SPAQ
91.6%

Industrials

SURI

-

SPAQ
0.1%

Real Estate

SURI

-

SPAQ

-

Technology

SURI

-

SPAQ

-

Utilities

SURI

-

SPAQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SURI vs. SPAQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SURI
SURI Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SURI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SURI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SURI Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SURI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SURI Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

SPAQ
SPAQ Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
SPAQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPAQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPAQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SPAQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPAQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SURI vs. SPAQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Propel Opportunities ETF (SURI) and Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SURISPAQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.13

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

0.94

+1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.91

3.39

+4.52

SURI vs. SPAQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SURI Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the SPAQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SURI and SPAQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SURISPAQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

0.57

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.86

-0.71

Drawdowns

SURI vs. SPAQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SURI drawdown since its inception was -47.76%, which is greater than SPAQ's maximum drawdown of -5.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SURI and SPAQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SURISPAQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.76%

-5.30%

-42.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.78%

-5.30%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.76%

-5.30%

-42.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.46%

-0.01%

-17.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.37%

-0.54%

-16.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

1.47%

+2.70%

Volatility

SURI vs. SPAQ - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Propel Opportunities ETF (SURI) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF (SPAQ) at 1.95%. This indicates that SURI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPAQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SURISPAQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.89%

1.95%

+3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.29%

5.01%

+9.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.79%

8.80%

+13.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.27%

7.00%

+21.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.27%

7.00%

+21.27%

SURI vs. SPAQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SURI has a 2.51% expense ratio, which is higher than SPAQ's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

SURI vs. SPAQ - Dividend Comparison

SURI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.04%, less than SPAQ's 16.23% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
SPAQ
Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF
16.23%16.69%3.00%2.60%
SURI
Simplify Propel Opportunities ETF
16.04%16.31%21.41%14.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


SURI and SPAQ have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SURI has higher volatility (5.89%) compared to SPAQ (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SURI dropped -47.76% vs SPAQ's -5.30%.

On 3-year performance, SURI leads with 6.93% vs 5.87% for SPAQ. On fees, SPAQ is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, SPAQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SURI has performed better with a 6.93% return vs 5.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPAQ is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 2.51% for SURI.

SPAQ has the higher dividend yield at 16.23%, compared with 16.04% for SURI.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 2.51% for SURI and 0.85% for SPAQ.

SURI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SURI and SPAQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer