SUOP.L vs. PRIP.L
SUOP.L (iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) and PRIP.L (Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D)) are both Corporate Bonds funds - SUOP.L tracks the Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate ESG SRI Index (USD) while PRIP.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUOP.L returned -0.63%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for PRIP.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SUOP.L charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRIP.L.
Performance
SUOP.L vs. PRIP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SUOP.L is traded in GBP, while PRIP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PRIP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUOP.L achieves a -0.30% return, which is significantly higher than PRIP.L's -0.61% return.
SUOP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- -0.30%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- -0.63%
- 10Y*
- —
PRIP.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- 6M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- -0.61%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- 3.65%
- 5Y*
- 0.43%
- 10Y*
- —
SUOP.L vs. PRIP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUOP.L iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | -0.30% | 7.21% | 2.00% | 6.65% | -15.85% | 1.60% |
PRIP.L Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) | -0.61% | 0.72% | 3.72% | 2.34% | -5.39% | 7.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUOP.L and PRIP.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021 | 0.42 |
The correlation between SUOP.L and PRIP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.49 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUOP.L vs. PRIP.L — Risk / Return Rank
SUOP.L
PRIP.L
SUOP.L vs. PRIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (SUOP.L) and Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SUOP.L | PRIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.10 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 0.80 | +0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.48 | 1.79 | +1.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SUOP.L vs. PRIP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUOP.L drawdown since its inception was -22.17%, smaller than the maximum PRIP.L drawdown of -26.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUOP.L and PRIP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUOP.L | PRIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.17% | -26.79% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -4.85% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.01% | -8.76% | +2.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.17% | -12.69% | -9.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.05% | -18.08% | +14.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.80% | -20.14% | +10.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 2.16% | -1.11% |
Volatility
SUOP.L vs. PRIP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (SUOP.L) is 1.02%, while Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIP.L) has a volatility of 1.73%. This indicates that SUOP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRIP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUOP.L | PRIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | 1.73% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.40% | 4.82% | -1.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.58% | 6.49% | -1.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.88% | 8.83% | -1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.80% | 12.06% | -5.26% |
SUOP.L vs. PRIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUOP.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than PRIP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SUOP.L vs. PRIP.L - Dividend Comparison
SUOP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than PRIP.L's 4.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRIP.L Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) | 4.76% | 4.73% | 4.29% | 4.10% | 4.14% | 3.33% | 3.30% |
SUOP.L iShares USD Corporate Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 4.92% | 4.74% | 4.68% | 4.13% | 4.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUOP.L and PRIP.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRIP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRIP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for SUOP.L.
SUOP.L tracks Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate ESG SRI Index (USD), while PRIP.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for SUOP.L and 0.05% for PRIP.L.
Find the right allocation for SUOP.L and PRIP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer