PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUOE.L vs. SUKC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUOE.L vs. SUKC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF (Dist) (SUOE.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUKC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SUOE.L is traded in EUR, while SUKC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SUKC.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUOE.L achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly higher than SUKC.L's -0.57% return.


SUOE.L

1D
0.15%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.57%
1Y
2.19%
3Y*
4.51%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*

SUKC.L

1D
0.13%
1M
0.35%
YTD
-0.57%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
-2.70%
3Y*
4.41%
5Y*
1.36%
10Y*
0.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUOE.L vs. SUKC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SUOE.L
iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.57%2.96%4.25%7.30%-13.15%-1.22%2.57%6.04%-0.59%
SUKC.L
SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
-0.57%-1.52%9.87%9.44%-10.63%5.66%-2.52%11.31%-2.11%

Correlation

The correlation between SUOE.L and SUKC.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2018

0.31

The correlation between SUOE.L and SUKC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUOE.L vs. SUKC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUOE.L
SUOE.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SUOE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUOE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUOE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SUOE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUOE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SUKC.L
SUKC.L Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SUKC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUOE.L vs. SUKC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF (Dist) (SUOE.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUKC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUOE.LSUKC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.95

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

-0.54

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.44

-0.87

+3.31

SUOE.L vs. SUKC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUOE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is higher than the SUKC.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUOE.L and SUKC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUOE.LSUKC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

-0.35

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.18

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.19

-0.02

Drawdowns

SUOE.L vs. SUKC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUOE.L drawdown since its inception was -17.06%, smaller than the maximum SUKC.L drawdown of -26.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUOE.L and SUKC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUOE.LSUKC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.06%

-26.12%

+9.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-5.18%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.72%

-6.14%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.06%

-16.49%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-3.83%

+2.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.76%

-9.09%

+4.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

3.24%

-2.47%

Volatility

SUOE.L vs. SUKC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF (Dist) (SUOE.L) is 1.24%, while SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUKC.L) has a volatility of 1.74%. This indicates that SUOE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUKC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUOE.LSUKC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.24%

1.74%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.71%

5.21%

-2.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10%

8.12%

-5.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.80%

7.44%

-2.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.49%

8.77%

-3.28%

SUOE.L vs. SUKC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUOE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SUKC.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUOE.L vs. SUKC.L - Dividend Comparison

SUOE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, while SUKC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SUKC.L
SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%2.29%4.41%3.05%1.76%1.77%1.97%1.93%1.88%2.44%2.40%2.55%
SUOE.L
iShares EUR Corporate Bond ESG UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.27%3.23%3.18%2.52%0.83%0.47%0.57%0.77%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUOE.L and SUKC.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SUOE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SUOE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SUKC.L.

SUOE.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while SUKC.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SUOE.L and 0.20% for SUKC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUOE.L and SUKC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer