SUKC.L vs. GBPC.L
SUKC.L (SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) and GBPC.L (L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) are both European Corporate Bonds funds - SUKC.L tracks the Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR while GBPC.L tracks the Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUKC.L returned 1.49%/yr vs -0.17%/yr for GBPC.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SUKC.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for GBPC.L.
Performance
SUKC.L vs. GBPC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SUKC.L is traded in GBP, while GBPC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GBPC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUKC.L achieves a -1.46% return, which is significantly lower than GBPC.L's 0.12% return.
SUKC.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- -1.46%
- 6M
- -1.58%
- 1Y
- -0.24%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- 1.49%
- 10Y*
- 1.84%
GBPC.L
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- 6.29%
- 5Y*
- -0.17%
- 10Y*
- —
SUKC.L vs. GBPC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUKC.L SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | -1.46% | 3.90% | 4.82% | 7.17% | -5.78% | -0.79% | 0.19% |
GBPC.L L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.12% | 6.83% | 2.78% | 8.45% | -17.18% | -2.43% | -0.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUKC.L and GBPC.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020 | 0.44 |
The correlation between SUKC.L and GBPC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.54 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUKC.L vs. GBPC.L — Risk / Return Rank
SUKC.L
GBPC.L
SUKC.L vs. GBPC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUKC.L) and L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUKC.L | GBPC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.15 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 1.18 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 3.91 | -4.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUKC.L | GBPC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | 0.78 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | -0.02 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | -0.10 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
SUKC.L vs. GBPC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUKC.L drawdown since its inception was -11.63%, smaller than the maximum GBPC.L drawdown of -28.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUKC.L and GBPC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUKC.L | GBPC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -28.18% | +16.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.75% | -4.14% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.75% | -4.14% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.63% | -27.49% | +15.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | -4.53% | +2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -11.46% | +10.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 1.25% | +0.77% |
Volatility
SUKC.L vs. GBPC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUKC.L) is 1.17%, while L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that SUKC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBPC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUKC.L | GBPC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.17% | 3.33% | -2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.45% | 5.09% | -0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.88% | 6.23% | +0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.72% | 8.19% | -3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.63% | 8.15% | -3.52% |
SUKC.L vs. GBPC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUKC.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GBPC.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SUKC.L vs. GBPC.L - Dividend Comparison
SUKC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBPC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GBPC.L L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 5.14% | 5.00% | 4.86% | 3.58% | 2.16% | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUKC.L SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 2.29% | 4.41% | 3.05% | 1.76% | 1.77% | 1.97% | 1.93% | 1.88% | 2.44% | 2.40% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUKC.L and GBPC.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GBPC.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GBPC.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SUKC.L.
SUKC.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR, while GBPC.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SUKC.L and 0.09% for GBPC.L.
Find the right allocation for SUKC.L and GBPC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer