PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUKC.L vs. CBSE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUKC.L vs. CBSE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUKC.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (CBSE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SUKC.L is traded in GBP, while CBSE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CBSE.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUKC.L achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly higher than CBSE.L's -0.05% return.


SUKC.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.58%
YTD
1.35%
6M
1.72%
1Y
4.59%
3Y*
6.73%
5Y*
2.57%
10Y*
2.42%

CBSE.L

1D
0.20%
1M
0.42%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.24%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
5.42%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUKC.L vs. CBSE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUKC.L
SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
1.35%6.37%4.84%7.17%-5.78%-0.79%3.08%4.66%-0.45%1.83%
CBSE.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
-0.05%8.60%-0.01%5.96%-10.95%-7.70%8.93%2.37%-1.04%-7.75%

Correlation

The correlation between SUKC.L and CBSE.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2017

0.31

Over the past year, the correlation between SUKC.L and CBSE.L has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.31, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUKC.L vs. CBSE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUKC.L
SUKC.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SUKC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUKC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

CBSE.L
CBSE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CBSE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBSE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBSE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CBSE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBSE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUKC.L vs. CBSE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUKC.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (CBSE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SUKC.LCBSE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.13

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

0.87

+1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.26

2.13

+3.13

SUKC.L vs. CBSE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUKC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the CBSE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUKC.L and CBSE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SUKC.L vs. CBSE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUKC.L drawdown since its inception was -11.60%, smaller than the maximum CBSE.L drawdown of -24.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUKC.L and CBSE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUKC.LCBSE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.60%

-24.02%

+12.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.07%

-4.12%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.07%

-4.12%

+2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.60%

-19.55%

+7.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-7.32%

+7.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.30%

-11.05%

+9.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

1.68%

-0.81%

Volatility

SUKC.L vs. CBSE.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SUKC.L) is 1.03%, while UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (CBSE.L) has a volatility of 1.26%. This indicates that SUKC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBSE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUKC.LCBSE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.03%

1.26%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.74%

3.76%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.09%

4.78%

+1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.55%

6.42%

-1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.52%

8.69%

-4.17%

SUKC.L vs. CBSE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SUKC.L and CBSE.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUKC.L vs. CBSE.L - Dividend Comparison

SUKC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than CBSE.L's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBSE.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
3.49%3.72%3.18%1.80%0.58%0.59%0.61%1.03%1.42%0.48%0.00%0.00%
SUKC.L
SPDR Bloomberg 0-5 Year Sterling Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
4.66%4.61%4.41%3.05%1.76%1.77%1.97%1.93%1.88%2.43%2.40%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUKC.L and CBSE.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SUKC.L and CBSE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

SUKC.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR, while CBSE.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and UBS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUKC.L and CBSE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer