PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUK2.L vs. FOGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUK2.L vs. FOGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF (SUK2.L) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUK2.L achieves a -11.17% return, which is significantly lower than FOGB.L's 3.33% return.


SUK2.L

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.81%
6M
-7.00%
YTD
-11.17%
1Y
-26.96%
3Y*
-19.46%
5Y*
-17.40%
10Y*
-16.92%

FOGB.L

1D
-0.47%
1M
0.62%
6M
-1.77%
YTD
3.33%
1Y
-4.66%
3Y*
-5.08%
5Y*
-8.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUK2.L vs. FOGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SUK2.L
L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF
-11.17%-32.13%-6.81%-6.41%-13.97%-32.73%-19.84%
FOGB.L
Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD
3.33%-9.49%-5.72%-6.98%-18.26%2.56%9.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SUK2.L and FOGB.L is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2020

-0.58

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between SUK2.L and FOGB.L has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.58 to -0.37, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUK2.L vs. FOGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUK2.L
SUK2.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SUK2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUK2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUK2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SUK2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUK2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

FOGB.L
FOGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
FOGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
FOGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUK2.L vs. FOGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF (SUK2.L) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SUK2.LFOGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

0.98

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

-0.25

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

-0.41

-0.97

SUK2.L vs. FOGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUK2.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.19, which is lower than the FOGB.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUK2.L and FOGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SUK2.L vs. FOGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUK2.L drawdown since its inception was -98.38%, which is greater than FOGB.L's maximum drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUK2.L and FOGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUK2.LFOGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.38%

-43.46%

-54.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.12%

-12.73%

-18.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.62%

-23.44%

-29.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.37%

-43.46%

-21.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.28%

-38.99%

-59.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.98%

-24.51%

-60.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.11%

7.79%

+11.32%

Volatility

SUK2.L vs. FOGB.L - Volatility Comparison

L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF (SUK2.L) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L) at 4.25%. This indicates that SUK2.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUK2.LFOGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

4.25%

+1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.46%

11.01%

+8.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.52%

15.10%

+7.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.53%

15.83%

+9.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.98%

15.43%

+14.55%

SUK2.L vs. FOGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUK2.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FOGB.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SUK2.L vs. FOGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SUK2.L nor FOGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SUK2.L and FOGB.L have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FOGB.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FOGB.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SUK2.L.

SUK2.L tracks L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF, while FOGB.L tracks Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD. They also come from different issuers: L&G and Rize ETF. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SUK2.L and 0.45% for FOGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUK2.L and FOGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer