PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUK2.L vs. 3BAL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUK2.L vs. 3BAL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SUK2.L) and WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUK2.L achieves a -12.71% return, which is significantly lower than 3BAL.L's 25.99% return. Over the past 10 years, SUK2.L has underperformed 3BAL.L with an annualized return of -17.07%, while 3BAL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 18.00% annualized return.


SUK2.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
-1.24%
6M
-7.72%
YTD
-12.71%
1Y
-27.94%
3Y*
-19.62%
5Y*
-17.69%
10Y*
-17.07%

3BAL.L

1D
-4.44%
1M
-2.06%
6M
16.39%
YTD
25.99%
1Y
159.56%
3Y*
137.08%
5Y*
79.57%
10Y*
18.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUK2.L vs. 3BAL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUK2.L
L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)
-12.71%-32.13%-6.81%-6.41%-13.97%-32.73%-1.17%-29.96%15.40%-23.23%
3BAL.L
WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged
25.99%433.07%68.07%63.85%-24.90%108.27%-79.89%25.77%-70.96%15.80%

Correlation

The correlation between SUK2.L and 3BAL.L is -0.55, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2014

-0.58

The correlation between SUK2.L and 3BAL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.58 to -0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUK2.L vs. 3BAL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUK2.L
SUK2.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SUK2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUK2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUK2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SUK2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUK2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

3BAL.L
3BAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
3BAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
3BAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUK2.L vs. 3BAL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SUK2.L) and WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SUK2.L3BAL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.33

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.91

3.49

-4.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.45

9.38

-10.84

SUK2.L vs. 3BAL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUK2.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.24, which is lower than the 3BAL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUK2.L and 3BAL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SUK2.L vs. 3BAL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUK2.L drawdown since its inception was -98.38%, roughly equal to the maximum 3BAL.L drawdown of -99.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUK2.L and 3BAL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUK2.L3BAL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.38%

-99.29%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.53%

-45.44%

+14.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.62%

-50.31%

-2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.37%

-77.94%

+12.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.18%

-97.78%

+11.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-98.31%

-47.30%

-51.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.98%

-81.80%

-3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.90%

16.93%

+1.97%

Volatility

SUK2.L vs. 3BAL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G FTSE 100 Super Short Strategy (Daily 2x) UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SUK2.L) is 5.69%, while WisdomTree EURO STOXX Banks 3x Daily Leveraged (3BAL.L) has a volatility of 16.99%. This indicates that SUK2.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3BAL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUK2.L3BAL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

16.99%

-11.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.48%

57.11%

-37.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.53%

68.89%

-46.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.52%

74.78%

-49.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.98%

82.40%

-52.42%

SUK2.L vs. 3BAL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUK2.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than 3BAL.L's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

SUK2.L vs. 3BAL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SUK2.L nor 3BAL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SUK2.L and 3BAL.L have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SUK2.L is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SUK2.L is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for 3BAL.L.

SUK2.L is categorized as Inverse Equities, while 3BAL.L is Leveraged Equities. SUK2.L tracks FTSE 100 Daily Super Short Strategy Index, while 3BAL.L tracks EURO STOXX Banks Daily Leverage 3 EUR Net Return Index. They also come from different issuers: L&G and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SUK2.L and 0.89% for 3BAL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUK2.L and 3BAL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer