PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUJP.L vs. CJPU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUJP.L) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CJPU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUJP.L achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly lower than CJPU.L's 12.44% return.


SUJP.L

1D
-1.34%
1M
1.49%
6M
2.90%
YTD
6.49%
1Y
17.35%
3Y*
9.87%
5Y*
4.16%
10Y*

CJPU.L

1D
-2.51%
1M
-5.70%
6M
6.20%
YTD
12.44%
1Y
30.44%
3Y*
16.15%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
8.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUJP.L
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
6.49%19.03%2.95%13.59%-18.40%0.65%17.90%22.23%-13.97%18.11%
CJPU.L
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
12.44%26.13%7.33%20.25%-17.32%0.50%16.08%17.64%-13.50%18.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SUJP.L and CJPU.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2017

0.93

The correlation between SUJP.L and CJPU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUJP.L vs. CJPU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUJP.L
SUJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SUJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
SUJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

CJPU.L
CJPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CJPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CJPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUJP.L) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CJPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SUJP.LCJPU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.26

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

2.37

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.91

7.70

-3.80

SUJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the CJPU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUJP.L and CJPU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SUJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUJP.L drawdown since its inception was -34.36%, which is greater than CJPU.L's maximum drawdown of -32.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUJP.L and CJPU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUJP.LCJPU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.36%

-32.64%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.70%

-12.79%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.85%

-14.74%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.36%

-32.64%

-1.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.42%

-7.07%

+4.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.13%

-5.86%

-4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.43%

3.94%

+0.49%

Volatility

SUJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUJP.L) is 5.44%, while iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CJPU.L) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that SUJP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CJPU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUJP.LCJPU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

7.14%

-1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.72%

18.29%

-1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.47%

21.85%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.96%

18.44%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.54%

17.12%

+0.42%

SUJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUJP.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CJPU.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUJP.L vs. CJPU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SUJP.L nor CJPU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SUJP.L and CJPU.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CJPU.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CJPU.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SUJP.L.

SUJP.L tracks MSCI Japan SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index (USD), while CJPU.L tracks MSCI Japan Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SUJP.L and 0.12% for CJPU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUJP.L and CJPU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer