PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUJA.L vs. TPXG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUJA.L vs. TPXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUJA.L) and Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUJA.L achieves a 3.53% return, which is significantly lower than TPXG.L's 14.95% return.


SUJA.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
7.15%
YTD
3.53%
6M
2.52%
1Y
13.20%
3Y*
6.15%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*

TPXG.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
5.60%
YTD
14.95%
6M
14.59%
1Y
32.01%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
10.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUJA.L vs. TPXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUJA.L
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
3.53%11.08%4.65%7.41%-8.78%2.14%13.75%18.34%-9.18%6.16%
TPXG.L
Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY
14.95%18.33%8.12%13.45%-6.05%2.07%7.12%8.68%-2.90%7.54%

Correlation

The correlation between SUJA.L and TPXG.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2017

0.43

Over the past year, SUJA.L and TPXG.L have become more correlated (0.87) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.

SUJA.L vs. TPXG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SUJA.L
TPXG.L

Industrials

21.6%
10.8%

Technology

19.5%
10.7%

Financial Services

18.0%
20.0%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
19.2%

Communication Services

12.2%
7.4%

Healthcare

7.6%
15.1%

Real Estate

3.0%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
4.7%

Basic Materials

1.9%
4.1%

Energy

-

3.7%

Utilities

-

3.0%

Industrials

SUJA.L
21.6%
TPXG.L
10.8%

Technology

SUJA.L
19.5%
TPXG.L
10.7%

Financial Services

SUJA.L
18.0%
TPXG.L
20.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SUJA.L
13.5%
TPXG.L
19.2%

Communication Services

SUJA.L
12.2%
TPXG.L
7.4%

Healthcare

SUJA.L
7.6%
TPXG.L
15.1%

Real Estate

SUJA.L
3.0%
TPXG.L
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

SUJA.L
2.7%
TPXG.L
4.7%

Basic Materials

SUJA.L
1.9%
TPXG.L
4.1%

Energy

SUJA.L

-

TPXG.L
3.7%

Utilities

SUJA.L

-

TPXG.L
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUJA.L vs. TPXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUJA.L
SUJA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SUJA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUJA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUJA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
SUJA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUJA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

TPXG.L
TPXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TPXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
TPXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUJA.L vs. TPXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUJA.L) and Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUJA.LTPXG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.35

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

3.01

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.53

9.66

-6.14

SUJA.L vs. TPXG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUJA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the TPXG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUJA.L and TPXG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUJA.LTPXG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

1.84

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.98

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.87

-0.54

Drawdowns

SUJA.L vs. TPXG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUJA.L drawdown since its inception was -23.81%, roughly equal to the maximum TPXG.L drawdown of -22.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUJA.L and TPXG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUJA.LTPXG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.81%

-22.96%

-0.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.57%

-10.57%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.83%

-12.96%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.93%

-18.00%

-2.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-0.19%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-4.42%

-2.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

3.30%

+0.43%

Volatility

SUJA.L vs. TPXG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUJA.L) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Amundi Japan Topix UCITS ETF JPY (TPXG.L) at 3.74%. This indicates that SUJA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUJA.LTPXG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

3.74%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.49%

14.16%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.02%

17.29%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.59%

20.10%

-4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

24.48%

-7.45%

SUJA.L vs. TPXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SUJA.L and TPXG.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SUJA.L vs. TPXG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SUJA.L nor TPXG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SUJA.L and TPXG.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SUJA.L and TPXG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUJA.L and TPXG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer