SUIS vs. CBTJ
SUIS (Canary Staked SUI ETF) and CBTJ (Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) are both Blockchain funds. SUIS is passively managed, while CBTJ is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SUIS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBTJ.
Performance
SUIS vs. CBTJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SUIS
- 1D
- -3.90%
- 1M
- -18.74%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBTJ
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- -12.47%
- YTD
- -17.54%
- 6M
- -23.16%
- 1Y
- -30.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SUIS vs. CBTJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SUIS Canary Staked SUI ETF | -16.11% |
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January | -3.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUIS and CBTJ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUIS vs. CBTJ — Risk / Return Rank
SUIS
CBTJ
SUIS vs. CBTJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary Staked SUI ETF (SUIS) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUIS | CBTJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -1.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.53 | -0.82 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
SUIS vs. CBTJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUIS drawdown since its inception was -40.33%, roughly equal to the maximum CBTJ drawdown of -39.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUIS and CBTJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUIS | CBTJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.33% | -39.82% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -39.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.33% | -39.82% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -15.21% | +3.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 23.76% | — |
Volatility
SUIS vs. CBTJ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUIS | CBTJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.06% | 27.14% | +58.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 86.06% | 25.62% | +60.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 86.06% | 25.62% | +60.44% |
SUIS vs. CBTJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUIS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CBTJ's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
SUIS vs. CBTJ - Dividend Comparison
SUIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January | 1.76% | 1.45% |
SUIS Canary Staked SUI ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUIS and CBTJ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBTJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBTJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SUIS.
CBTJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.00% for SUIS.
They also come from different issuers: Canary and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SUIS and 0.69% for CBTJ.
Find the right allocation for SUIS and CBTJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer