PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUGA.L vs. COPA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUGA.L vs. COPA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Sugar (SUGA.L) and WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUGA.L achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly lower than COPA.L's 13.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SUGA.L has underperformed COPA.L with an annualized return of -2.92%, while COPA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.33% annualized return.


SUGA.L

1D
-0.86%
1M
-7.18%
YTD
-3.17%
6M
-2.16%
1Y
-17.30%
3Y*
-11.77%
5Y*
1.18%
10Y*
-2.92%

COPA.L

1D
0.27%
1M
9.03%
YTD
13.93%
6M
21.07%
1Y
30.28%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
10.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUGA.L vs. COPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUGA.L
WisdomTree Sugar
-3.17%-17.47%-5.25%23.23%11.54%23.41%6.59%-0.53%-24.60%-27.09%
COPA.L
WisdomTree Copper
13.93%36.37%4.81%2.66%-13.58%24.36%21.41%4.90%-20.37%26.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SUGA.L and COPA.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2007

0.20

The correlation between SUGA.L and COPA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUGA.L vs. COPA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUGA.L
SUGA.L Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
SUGA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUGA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUGA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
SUGA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUGA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

COPA.L
COPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
COPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
COPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUGA.L vs. COPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Sugar (SUGA.L) and WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUGA.LCOPA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.22

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.79

1.19

-1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.31

2.57

-3.88

SUGA.L vs. COPA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUGA.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the COPA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUGA.L and COPA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUGA.LCOPA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.70

0.91

-1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.27

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.11

0.44

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

0.09

-0.19

Drawdowns

SUGA.L vs. COPA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUGA.L drawdown since its inception was -83.65%, which is greater than COPA.L's maximum drawdown of -67.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUGA.L and COPA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUGA.LCOPA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.65%

-67.44%

-16.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.69%

-25.25%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.76%

-25.25%

-18.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.76%

-34.64%

-9.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.83%

-38.75%

-29.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.67%

-2.26%

-66.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.34%

-33.24%

-18.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.20%

11.73%

+1.47%

Volatility

SUGA.L vs. COPA.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Sugar (SUGA.L) and WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L) have volatilities of 8.76% and 8.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUGA.LCOPA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.76%

8.83%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.33%

18.91%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.70%

33.17%

-8.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.12%

26.20%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.90%

23.28%

+2.62%

SUGA.L vs. COPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SUGA.L and COPA.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

SUGA.L vs. COPA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SUGA.L nor COPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SUGA.L and COPA.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SUGA.L and COPA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.

SUGA.L is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while COPA.L is Metals. SUGA.L tracks Bloomberg Sugar, while COPA.L tracks Bloomberg Copper Subindex.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUGA.L and COPA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer