PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUBFX vs. SCCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUBFX vs. SCCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX) and Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund (SCCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUBFX achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly higher than SCCIX's 0.50% return. Over the past 10 years, SUBFX has outperformed SCCIX with an annualized return of 3.93%, while SCCIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.37% annualized return.


SUBFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
0.79%
6M
0.54%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
6.44%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*
3.93%

SCCIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.50%
6M
0.21%
1Y
5.92%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
2.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUBFX vs. SCCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUBFX
Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund
0.79%10.61%4.22%8.53%-4.74%-0.32%11.18%6.52%0.53%2.04%
SCCIX
Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund
0.50%7.63%1.45%5.41%-13.22%-1.96%15.39%7.96%1.24%3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between SUBFX and SCCIX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2011

0.53

Over the past year, SUBFX and SCCIX have become more correlated (0.91) than their long-term average of 0.53, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUBFX vs. SCCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUBFX
SUBFX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SUBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SUBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

SCCIX
SCCIX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SCCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SCCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUBFX vs. SCCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX) and Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund (SCCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUBFXSCCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.25

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

1.95

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.16

6.09

+4.07

SUBFX vs. SCCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the SCCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUBFX and SCCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUBFXSCCIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.44

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.03

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.46

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.45

+0.50

Drawdowns

SUBFX vs. SCCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUBFX drawdown since its inception was -11.22%, smaller than the maximum SCCIX drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUBFX and SCCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUBFXSCCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.22%

-22.19%

+10.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.34%

-3.04%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.88%

-7.40%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.17%

-18.25%

+7.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.22%

-19.25%

+8.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-1.59%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-3.49%

+2.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

0.97%

-0.37%

Volatility

SUBFX vs. SCCIX - Volatility Comparison

Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX) and Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund (SCCIX) have volatilities of 1.51% and 1.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUBFXSCCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

1.44%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

2.94%

-0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.42%

4.16%

-0.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.49%

6.35%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.29%

5.19%

+0.10%

SUBFX vs. SCCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUBFX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCCIX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

SUBFX vs. SCCIX - Dividend Comparison

SUBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than SCCIX's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCCIX
Carillon Reams Core Bond Fund
4.30%4.34%4.39%3.82%2.36%1.13%3.13%4.39%2.26%1.75%3.86%1.66%
SUBFX
Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund
6.06%6.44%4.92%4.52%2.16%1.96%3.01%2.83%2.06%1.17%1.01%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, SUBFX and SCCIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SUBFX has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to SCCIX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUBFX dropped -11.22% vs SCCIX's -22.19%.

SUBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUBFX and SCCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer