SUBFX vs. RPIDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX) and T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPIDX).
SUBFX is managed by Carillon Family of Funds. It was launched on Sep 28, 2011. RPIDX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jan 10, 2019.
Performance
SUBFX vs. RPIDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SUBFX vs. RPIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUBFX Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund | 0.65% | 10.61% | 4.22% | 8.53% | -4.74% | -0.32% | 11.18% | 6.15% |
RPIDX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund | 0.63% | 13.01% | 7.39% | 4.72% | -0.76% | 6.21% | 2.71% | 6.87% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SUBFX having a 0.65% return and RPIDX slightly lower at 0.63%.
SUBFX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -1.02%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- 6.40%
- 5Y*
- 3.58%
- 10Y*
- 4.06%
RPIDX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 0.63%
- 6M
- 2.98%
- 1Y
- 10.90%
- 3Y*
- 7.98%
- 5Y*
- 4.92%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SUBFX vs. RPIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUBFX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than RPIDX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SUBFX vs. RPIDX — Risk / Return Rank
SUBFX
RPIDX
SUBFX vs. RPIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX) and T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SUBFX | RPIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 2.82 | -0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.15 | 4.88 | -1.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.69 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | 4.09 | -0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.88 | 17.02 | -3.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SUBFX | RPIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.82 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 1.28 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 1.16 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between SUBFX and RPIDX is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
SUBFX vs. RPIDX - Dividend Comparison
SUBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, less than RPIDX's 12.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUBFX Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund | 5.88% | 6.44% | 4.92% | 4.52% | 2.16% | 1.96% | 3.01% | 2.83% | 2.06% | 1.17% | 1.01% | 0.52% |
RPIDX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund | 12.78% | 12.85% | 6.87% | 6.64% | 7.97% | 5.34% | 7.14% | 4.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SUBFX vs. RPIDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUBFX drawdown since its inception was -11.22%, smaller than the maximum RPIDX drawdown of -19.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUBFX and RPIDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUBFX | RPIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.22% | -19.95% | +8.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.11% | -2.81% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.17% | -7.31% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -11.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.17% | -1.14% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -1.89% | +0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 0.67% | -0.12% |
Volatility
SUBFX vs. RPIDX - Volatility Comparison
Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPIDX) at 0.94%. This indicates that SUBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SUBFX | RPIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 0.94% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.20% | 2.67% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.56% | 3.91% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.43% | 3.86% | +1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 4.84% | +0.42% |