PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUBD.AX vs. CSH2.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SUBD.AX vs. CSH2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Vaneck Australian Subordinated Debt ETF (SUBD.AX) and Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SUBD.AX vs. CSH2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SUBD.AX
Vaneck Australian Subordinated Debt ETF
1.03%5.55%7.13%7.11%0.27%2.12%2.39%0.59%
CSH2.L
Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP
-4.11%4.40%14.30%10.33%-3.33%5.04%-5.71%0.59%
Different Trading Currencies

SUBD.AX is traded in AUD, while CSH2.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSH2.L values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUBD.AX achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly higher than CSH2.L's -4.11% return.


SUBD.AX

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
1.03%
6M
2.20%
1Y
5.61%
3Y*
6.33%
5Y*
4.42%
10Y*

CSH2.L

1D
-0.53%
1M
1.43%
YTD
-4.11%
6M
-3.82%
1Y
-3.26%
3Y*
6.33%
5Y*
4.61%
10Y*
2.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SUBD.AX vs. CSH2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUBD.AX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CSH2.L's 0.07% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SUBD.AX vs. CSH2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUBD.AX
SUBD.AX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
SUBD.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUBD.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUBD.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
SUBD.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUBD.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

CSH2.L
CSH2.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSH2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUBD.AX vs. CSH2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaneck Australian Subordinated Debt ETF (SUBD.AX) and Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUBD.AXCSH2.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.11

-0.43

+4.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.69

-0.58

+6.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.24

0.93

+1.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.03

-0.32

+5.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

31.58

-0.73

+32.31

SUBD.AX vs. CSH2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUBD.AX Sharpe Ratio is 4.11, which is higher than the CSH2.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUBD.AX and CSH2.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUBD.AXCSH2.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.11

-0.43

+4.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

3.23

0.61

+2.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.17

+0.67

Correlation

The correlation between SUBD.AX and CSH2.L is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

SUBD.AX vs. CSH2.L - Dividend Comparison

SUBD.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, while CSH2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
SUBD.AX
Vaneck Australian Subordinated Debt ETF
5.37%5.54%5.85%5.13%2.60%1.90%2.01%0.18%
CSH2.L
Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SUBD.AX vs. CSH2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUBD.AX drawdown since its inception was -10.85%, smaller than the maximum CSH2.L drawdown of -27.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUBD.AX and CSH2.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SUBD.AXCSH2.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.85%

-0.37%

-10.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.12%

-0.16%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.87%

-0.29%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

0.00%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.44%

0.00%

-0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

0.03%

+0.15%

Volatility

SUBD.AX vs. CSH2.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vaneck Australian Subordinated Debt ETF (SUBD.AX) is 0.26%, while Lyxor Smart Overnight Return UCITS ETF C-GBP (CSH2.L) has a volatility of 2.24%. This indicates that SUBD.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSH2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SUBD.AXCSH2.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.26%

2.24%

-1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.65%

4.71%

-4.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36%

7.59%

-6.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.37%

7.54%

-6.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.86%

8.72%

-3.86%