CVE.TO vs. PPL.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE.TO) and Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CVE.TO or PPL.TO.
Key characteristics
CVE.TO | PPL.TO | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 3.79% | 33.43% |
1Y Return | -10.50% | 39.83% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 15.41% | 18.11% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 15.22% | 11.35% |
10Y Return (Ann) | -0.42% | 8.40% |
Sharpe Ratio | -0.41 | 3.82 |
Sortino Ratio | -0.40 | 5.37 |
Omega Ratio | 0.95 | 1.69 |
Calmar Ratio | -0.35 | 3.79 |
Martin Ratio | -0.91 | 33.96 |
Ulcer Index | 12.96% | 1.19% |
Daily Std Dev | 28.45% | 10.60% |
Max Drawdown | -92.84% | -68.76% |
Current Drawdown | -24.21% | -2.22% |
Fundamentals
CVE.TO | PPL.TO | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | CA$41.20B | CA$33.90B |
EPS | CA$2.05 | CA$3.28 |
PE Ratio | 11.00 | 17.81 |
PEG Ratio | 0.28 | 1.36 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$41.42B | CA$5.89B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$5.42B | CA$2.18B |
EBITDA (TTM) | CA$7.99B | CA$2.42B |
Correlation
The correlation between CVE.TO and PPL.TO is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
CVE.TO vs. PPL.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, CVE.TO achieves a 3.79% return, which is significantly lower than PPL.TO's 33.43% return. Over the past 10 years, CVE.TO has underperformed PPL.TO with an annualized return of -0.42%, while PPL.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.40% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CVE.TO vs. PPL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE.TO) and Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CVE.TO vs. PPL.TO - Dividend Comparison
CVE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, less than PPL.TO's 4.65% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cenovus Energy Inc. | 3.49% | 2.40% | 1.83% | 0.64% | 0.77% | 1.59% | 2.08% | 1.74% | 0.99% | 4.87% | 4.44% | 3.18% |
Pembina Pipeline Corporation | 4.65% | 5.83% | 5.57% | 6.57% | 8.37% | 4.90% | 5.53% | 4.48% | 4.52% | 5.97% | 4.06% | 4.40% |
Drawdowns
CVE.TO vs. PPL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CVE.TO drawdown since its inception was -92.84%, which is greater than PPL.TO's maximum drawdown of -68.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CVE.TO and PPL.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CVE.TO vs. PPL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Cenovus Energy Inc. (CVE.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.20% compared to Pembina Pipeline Corporation (PPL.TO) at 3.09%. This indicates that CVE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CVE.TO vs. PPL.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cenovus Energy Inc. and Pembina Pipeline Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities