PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STYC.L vs. UHYG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STYC.L vs. UHYG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L) and Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (UHYG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

STYC.L is traded in USD, while UHYG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the UHYG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STYC.L achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly higher than UHYG.L's 1.20% return.


STYC.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.99%
1Y
7.22%
3Y*
8.74%
5Y*
5.21%
10Y*
5.50%

UHYG.L

1D
0.19%
1M
0.54%
YTD
1.20%
6M
-3.78%
1Y
0.76%
3Y*
6.45%
5Y*
2.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STYC.L vs. UHYG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STYC.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc
1.41%9.13%8.08%11.66%-4.84%4.37%3.84%10.02%-0.61%5.45%
UHYG.L
Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
1.20%2.94%7.91%11.21%-12.19%3.55%5.28%13.98%-2.40%6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between STYC.L and UHYG.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2016

0.55

The correlation between STYC.L and UHYG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STYC.L vs. UHYG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STYC.L
STYC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
STYC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STYC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
STYC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
STYC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
STYC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

UHYG.L
UHYG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
UHYG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UHYG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
UHYG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
UHYG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
UHYG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STYC.L vs. UHYG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L) and Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (UHYG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STYC.LUHYG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.03

+0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

0.10

+4.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.96

0.21

+16.75

STYC.L vs. UHYG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STYC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the UHYG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STYC.L and UHYG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STYC.LUHYG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

0.10

+2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.29

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.44

+0.32

Drawdowns

STYC.L vs. UHYG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STYC.L drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, roughly equal to the maximum UHYG.L drawdown of -22.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STYC.L and UHYG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STYC.LUHYG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.57%

-22.38%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.68%

-7.34%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.94%

-7.34%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.62%

-17.09%

+7.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-4.23%

+4.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.67%

-3.29%

+1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

3.57%

-3.15%

Volatility

STYC.L vs. UHYG.L - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L) and Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (UHYG.L) have volatilities of 1.41% and 1.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STYC.LUHYG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

1.40%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

7.05%

-4.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39%

7.61%

-4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.70%

8.30%

-2.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.49%

8.67%

-2.18%

STYC.L vs. UHYG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

STYC.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than UHYG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

STYC.L vs. UHYG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither STYC.L nor UHYG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
STYC.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UHYG.L
Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%3.44%6.00%5.93%6.98%6.98%6.59%5.42%4.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


STYC.L and UHYG.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UHYG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UHYG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for STYC.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for STYC.L and 0.25% for UHYG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STYC.L and UHYG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer