STYC.L vs. STHS.L
STYC.L (PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc) and STHS.L (PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc) are both High Yield Bonds funds from PIMCO - STYC.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD while STHS.L tracks the PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, STYC.L returned 5.26%/yr vs 4.50%/yr for STHS.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
STYC.L vs. STHS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
STYC.L is traded in USD, while STHS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the STHS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STYC.L achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly lower than STHS.L's 2.09% return. Over the past 10 years, STYC.L has outperformed STHS.L with an annualized return of 5.26%, while STHS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.50% annualized return.
STYC.L
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 6.20%
- 3Y*
- 8.33%
- 5Y*
- 5.14%
- 10Y*
- 5.26%
STHS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 6.90%
- 3Y*
- 9.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- 4.50%
STYC.L vs. STHS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STYC.L PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc | 1.69% | 9.13% | 8.08% | 11.66% | -4.84% | 4.37% | 3.84% | 10.02% | -0.49% | 5.31% |
STHS.L PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc | 2.09% | 16.72% | 6.47% | 16.46% | -15.71% | 3.10% | 5.01% | 12.34% | -7.90% | 14.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between STYC.L and STHS.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2015 | 0.55 |
The correlation between STYC.L and STHS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STYC.L vs. STHS.L — Risk / Return Rank
STYC.L
STHS.L
STYC.L vs. STHS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L) and PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc (STHS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STYC.L | STHS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.15 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | 1.08 | +2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.40 | 2.74 | +11.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STYC.L vs. STHS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STYC.L drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, smaller than the maximum STHS.L drawdown of -34.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STYC.L and STHS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STYC.L | STHS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.57% | -34.30% | +12.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.68% | -6.28% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.94% | -8.43% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.62% | -29.82% | +20.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.57% | -34.30% | +12.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -1.25% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -7.38% | +5.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.43% | 2.49% | -2.06% |
Volatility
STYC.L vs. STHS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L) is 0.51%, while PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc (STHS.L) has a volatility of 1.99%. This indicates that STYC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STHS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STYC.L | STHS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.51% | 1.99% | -1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.70% | 6.09% | -3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39% | 8.02% | -4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.71% | 12.10% | -6.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.43% | 12.40% | -5.97% |
Dividends
STYC.L vs. STHS.L - Dividend Comparison
STYC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STHS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STHS.L PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc | 7.47% | 7.11% | 7.57% | 6.39% | 4.95% | 4.52% | 4.92% | 5.08% | 5.34% | 5.18% | 5.43% | 0.37% |
STYC.L PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STYC.L and STHS.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STYC.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while STHS.L tracks PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc.
Find the right allocation for STYC.L and STHS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer