STYC.L vs. HYEA.L
STYC.L (PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc) and HYEA.L (iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - STYC.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD while HYEA.L tracks the ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, STYC.L returned 5.21%/yr vs 2.99%/yr for HYEA.L. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STYC.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HYEA.L.
Performance
STYC.L vs. HYEA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
STYC.L is traded in USD, while HYEA.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the HYEA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STYC.L achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly higher than HYEA.L's 0.59% return.
STYC.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 7.22%
- 3Y*
- 8.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.21%
- 10Y*
- 5.50%
HYEA.L
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 1.68%
- 1Y
- 6.08%
- 3Y*
- 8.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.99%
- 10Y*
- —
STYC.L vs. HYEA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STYC.L PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc | 1.41% | 9.13% | 8.08% | 11.66% | -4.84% | 4.37% | 3.84% | 10.02% | -0.61% | -0.20% |
HYEA.L iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF | 0.59% | 15.17% | 2.47% | 12.66% | -12.07% | 0.88% | 6.94% | 11.93% | -3.98% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between STYC.L and HYEA.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2017 | 0.63 |
The correlation between STYC.L and HYEA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STYC.L vs. HYEA.L — Risk / Return Rank
STYC.L
HYEA.L
STYC.L vs. HYEA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L) and iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STYC.L | HYEA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.19 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.27 | 1.26 | +3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.96 | 4.18 | +12.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STYC.L | HYEA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 1.07 | +1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.37 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.43 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
STYC.L vs. HYEA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STYC.L drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, smaller than the maximum HYEA.L drawdown of -23.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STYC.L and HYEA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STYC.L | HYEA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.57% | -23.34% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.68% | -4.79% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.94% | -5.05% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.62% | -22.62% | +13.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -1.36% | +1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -4.18% | +2.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.42% | 1.45% | -1.03% |
Volatility
STYC.L vs. HYEA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L) is 1.41%, while iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (HYEA.L) has a volatility of 1.49%. This indicates that STYC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYEA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STYC.L | HYEA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 1.49% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | 3.98% | -1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39% | 5.69% | -2.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.70% | 8.12% | -2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.49% | 8.70% | -2.21% |
STYC.L vs. HYEA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
STYC.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than HYEA.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
STYC.L vs. HYEA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither STYC.L nor HYEA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
STYC.L and HYEA.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYEA.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYEA.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for STYC.L.
STYC.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while HYEA.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for STYC.L and 0.50% for HYEA.L.
Find the right allocation for STYC.L and HYEA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer