PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STYC.L vs. EMLI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STYC.L vs. EMLI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L) and PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (EMLI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STYC.L achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than EMLI.L's 1.64% return. Over the past 10 years, STYC.L has outperformed EMLI.L with an annualized return of 5.50%, while EMLI.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.23% annualized return.


STYC.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.99%
1Y
7.22%
3Y*
8.74%
5Y*
5.21%
10Y*
5.50%

EMLI.L

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
1.64%
6M
1.64%
1Y
8.36%
3Y*
6.38%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
3.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STYC.L vs. EMLI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STYC.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc
1.41%9.13%8.08%11.66%-4.84%4.37%3.84%10.02%-0.61%5.45%
EMLI.L
PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist
1.64%16.62%-3.24%13.68%-5.61%-5.52%1.92%13.04%-6.89%12.58%

Correlation

The correlation between STYC.L and EMLI.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2015

0.47

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STYC.L vs. EMLI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STYC.L
STYC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
STYC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STYC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
STYC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
STYC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
STYC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

EMLI.L
EMLI.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
EMLI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMLI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMLI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EMLI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMLI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STYC.L vs. EMLI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L) and PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (EMLI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STYC.LEMLI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.25

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.27

1.47

+2.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.96

5.23

+11.73

STYC.L vs. EMLI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STYC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the EMLI.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STYC.L and EMLI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STYC.LEMLI.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.29

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.33

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

0.34

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.23

+0.53

Drawdowns

STYC.L vs. EMLI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STYC.L drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, smaller than the maximum EMLI.L drawdown of -25.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STYC.L and EMLI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STYC.LEMLI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.57%

-25.62%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.68%

-5.67%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.94%

-7.82%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.62%

-19.52%

+9.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.57%

-21.08%

-0.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-2.80%

+2.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.67%

-7.31%

+5.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

1.59%

-1.17%

Volatility

STYC.L vs. EMLI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L) is 1.41%, while PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (EMLI.L) has a volatility of 2.02%. This indicates that STYC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMLI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STYC.LEMLI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

2.02%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

5.40%

-2.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39%

6.49%

-3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.70%

9.89%

-4.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.49%

9.59%

-3.10%

STYC.L vs. EMLI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

STYC.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than EMLI.L's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

STYC.L vs. EMLI.L - Dividend Comparison

STYC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMLI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMLI.L
PIMCO Emerging Markets Advantage Local Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist
6.55%5.81%6.33%5.70%5.21%4.50%3.68%5.24%5.83%5.76%6.69%7.09%
STYC.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


STYC.L and EMLI.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, STYC.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

STYC.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EMLI.L.

STYC.L is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while EMLI.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. STYC.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while EMLI.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for STYC.L and 0.61% for EMLI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STYC.L and EMLI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer