STYAX vs. TGLMX
STYAX (Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund) and TGLMX (TCW Total Return Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, STYAX returned 2.18%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for TGLMX. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. STYAX charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for TGLMX.
Performance
STYAX vs. TGLMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STYAX achieves a -0.50% return, which is significantly lower than TGLMX's 0.59% return. Over the past 10 years, STYAX has outperformed TGLMX with an annualized return of 2.18%, while TGLMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.31% annualized return.
STYAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- 6M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 1Y
- 1.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.04%
- 5Y*
- -0.33%
- 10Y*
- 2.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.92%
TGLMX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 0.59%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- 1.31%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.55%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
STYAX vs. TGLMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STYAX Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund | -0.50% | 7.03% | 2.05% | 6.45% | -14.29% | -0.16% | 11.30% | 9.11% | -0.52% | 5.33% |
TGLMX TCW Total Return Bond Fund | 0.59% | 8.99% | 1.82% | 5.05% | -16.59% | -1.05% | 8.32% | 7.28% | 0.80% | 3.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between STYAX and TGLMX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999 | 0.79 |
The correlation between STYAX and TGLMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.96 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STYAX vs. TGLMX — Risk / Return Rank
STYAX
TGLMX
STYAX vs. TGLMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund (STYAX) and TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STYAX | TGLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.21 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 1.84 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.47 | 4.83 | -2.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STYAX vs. TGLMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STYAX drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, smaller than the maximum TGLMX drawdown of -22.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STYAX and TGLMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STYAX | TGLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.83% | -22.26% | +3.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -2.63% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.12% | -7.20% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.83% | -22.17% | +3.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.83% | -22.26% | +3.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.28% | -3.36% | +1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.39% | -3.79% | +1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.14% | 1.00% | +0.14% |
Volatility
STYAX vs. TGLMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund (STYAX) is 0.97%, while TCW Total Return Bond Fund (TGLMX) has a volatility of 1.03%. This indicates that STYAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TGLMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STYAX | TGLMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 1.03% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.90% | 3.22% | -0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64% | 4.16% | -0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.68% | 7.06% | -1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.71% | 5.60% | -0.89% |
STYAX vs. TGLMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
STYAX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than TGLMX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
STYAX vs. TGLMX - Dividend Comparison
STYAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, less than TGLMX's 6.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STYAX Allspring Core Plus Bond Fund | 4.60% | 4.52% | 4.58% | 3.94% | 2.48% | 2.39% | 5.18% | 3.67% | 2.70% | 2.61% | 2.81% | 2.23% |
TGLMX TCW Total Return Bond Fund | 6.07% | 7.19% | 6.52% | 6.13% | 3.27% | 2.08% | 3.37% | 4.07% | 3.55% | 2.89% | 4.13% | 2.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, STYAX and TGLMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TGLMX has higher volatility (1.03%) compared to STYAX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STYAX dropped -18.83% vs TGLMX's -22.26%.
TGLMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STYAX and TGLMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer