STXV vs. VTV

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

STXV (Strive 1000 Value ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - STXV tracks the Bloomberg US 1000 Value while VTV tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXV returned 17.31%/yr vs 18.09%/yr for VTV. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STXV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.

Performance

STXV vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with STXV having a 15.61% return and VTV slightly higher at 15.97%.

STXV

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 0.63%
• 6M: 11.81%
• YTD: 15.61%
• 1Y: 25.40%
• 3Y*: 17.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VTV

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 1.47%
• 6M: 12.54%
• YTD: 15.97%
• 1Y: 25.53%
• 3Y*: 18.09%
• 5Y*: 12.27%
• 10Y*: 12.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXV vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
STXV Strive 1000 Value ETF	15.61%	16.26%	13.34%	9.28%	-0.08%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	15.97%	15.27%	15.95%	9.32%	2.97%

Correlation

The correlation between STXV and VTV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022	0.95

The correlation between STXV and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

STXV vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	STXV	VTV
Financial Services	22.4%	21.5%
Healthcare	17.4%	14.1%
Technology	12.1%	16.5%
Energy	10.3%	7.4%
Industrials	8.1%	13.6%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	8.9%
Utilities	6.3%	4.8%
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	4.0%
Communication Services	3.9%	2.9%
Real Estate	3.4%	2.7%
Basic Materials	2.8%	3.3%

Return for Risk

STXV vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXV

STXV Risk / Return Rank: 90
STXV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
STXV Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
STXV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
STXV Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
STXV Martin Ratio Rank: 89

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 88
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 87
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXV vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STXV	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	2.39	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	3.45	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.43	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.27	3.91	+0.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.49	14.82	+0.67

STXV vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXV Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXV and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

STXV vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXV drawdown since its inception was -14.80%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXV and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	STXV	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.80%	-59.27%	+44.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.81%	-6.35%	+0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.80%	-14.52%	-0.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.04%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-0.17%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.69%	-7.84%	+5.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	1.68%	-0.08%

Volatility

STXV vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) is 2.82%, while Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that STXV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STXV	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	3.32%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.96%	7.77%	-0.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.12%	10.40%	-0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.14%	13.86%	-0.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.14%	16.60%	-3.46%

STXV vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

STXV vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

STXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than VTV's 1.87% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
STXV Strive 1000 Value ETF	2.07%	2.37%	2.36%	2.05%	0.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.87%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STXV and VTV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, STXV and VTV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, STXV or VTV?

VTV has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to STXV (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXV dropped -14.80% vs VTV's -59.27%.

Which ETF is better, STXV or VTV?

On 3-year performance, VTV leads with 18.09% vs 17.31% for STXV. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, STXV has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STXV or VTV?

Over the 3-year period, VTV has performed better with a 18.09% return vs 17.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STXV or VTV?

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for STXV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STXV or VTV?

STXV has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.87% for VTV.

What is the main difference between STXV and VTV?

STXV tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Value, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXV and 0.04% for VTV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STXV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.