PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STXV vs. LSVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STXV vs. LSVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXV achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly lower than LSVD's 17.67% return.


STXV

1D
-0.12%
1M
3.00%
YTD
12.50%
6M
13.79%
1Y
27.20%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
10Y*

LSVD

1D
-0.43%
1M
7.12%
YTD
17.67%
6M
18.95%
1Y
43.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXV vs. LSVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
STXV
Strive 1000 Value ETF
12.50%16.26%0.94%
LSVD
LSV Disciplined Value ETF
17.67%22.29%0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between STXV and LSVD is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

0.70

The correlation between STXV and LSVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

STXV vs. LSVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
STXV
LSVD

Financial Services

21.1%
12.5%

Healthcare

16.5%
11.8%

Technology

12.8%
34.8%

Energy

11.2%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.9%
3.2%

Industrials

7.7%
4.8%

Utilities

6.2%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
12.0%

Communication Services

4.5%
15.4%

Real Estate

3.4%
1.2%

Basic Materials

3.1%
1.5%

Financial Services

STXV
21.1%
LSVD
12.5%

Healthcare

STXV
16.5%
LSVD
11.8%

Technology

STXV
12.8%
LSVD
34.8%

Energy

STXV
11.2%
LSVD
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

STXV
7.9%
LSVD
3.2%

Industrials

STXV
7.7%
LSVD
4.8%

Utilities

STXV
6.2%
LSVD
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

STXV
5.8%
LSVD
12.0%

Communication Services

STXV
4.5%
LSVD
15.4%

Real Estate

STXV
3.4%
LSVD
1.2%

Basic Materials

STXV
3.1%
LSVD
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STXV vs. LSVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXV
STXV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
STXV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
STXV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXV Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

LSVD
LSVD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LSVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSVD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LSVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSVD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXV vs. LSVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STXVLSVDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.61

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.70

5.38

-0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.14

24.69

-7.56

STXV vs. LSVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXV Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the LSVD Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXV and LSVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STXVLSVDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

3.41

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

1.66

-0.59

Drawdowns

STXV vs. LSVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXV drawdown since its inception was -14.80%, smaller than the maximum LSVD drawdown of -19.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXV and LSVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STXVLSVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.80%

-19.30%

+4.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.81%

-8.07%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.53%

+0.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-2.47%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.76%

-0.17%

Volatility

STXV vs. LSVD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) is 2.03%, while LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that STXV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STXVLSVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.03%

3.36%

-1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.03%

9.52%

-2.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.08%

12.76%

-2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.22%

17.45%

-4.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.22%

17.45%

-4.23%

STXV vs. LSVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than LSVD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

STXV vs. LSVD - Dividend Comparison

STXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than LSVD's 0.27% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
LSVD
LSV Disciplined Value ETF
0.27%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STXV
Strive 1000 Value ETF
2.24%2.37%2.36%2.05%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


STXV and LSVD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSVD has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to STXV (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXV dropped -14.80% vs LSVD's -19.30%.

On 1-year performance, LSVD leads with 43.26% vs 27.20% for STXV. On fees, STXV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, STXV has been the lower-risk option at 2.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LSVD has performed better with a 43.26% return vs 27.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STXV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LSVD.

STXV has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 0.27% for LSVD.

They also come from different issuers: Strive and LSV. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXV and 0.40% for LSVD.

LSVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STXV and LSVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer