STXV vs. BGIG

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

STXV (Strive 1000 Value ETF) and BGIG (Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. STXV is passively managed, while BGIG is actively managed. Over the past year, STXV returned 25.40% vs 19.97% for BGIG. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STXV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BGIG.

Performance

STXV vs. BGIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXV achieves a 15.61% return, which is significantly higher than BGIG's 12.49% return.

STXV

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 0.63%
• 6M: 11.81%
• YTD: 15.61%
• 1Y: 25.40%
• 3Y*: 17.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BGIG

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 1.52%
• 6M: 11.47%
• YTD: 12.49%
• 1Y: 19.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXV vs. BGIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
STXV Strive 1000 Value ETF	15.61%	16.26%	13.34%	4.90%
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF	12.49%	12.49%	16.84%	3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between STXV and BGIG is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	0.81

The correlation between STXV and BGIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

STXV vs. BGIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	STXV	BGIG
Financial Services	22.4%	14.4%
Healthcare	17.4%	15.2%
Technology	12.1%	25.7%
Energy	10.3%	10.2%
Industrials	8.1%	10.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	6.8%
Utilities	6.3%	7.2%
Consumer Cyclical	5.7%	4.8%
Communication Services	3.9%	0.8%
Real Estate	3.4%	3.8%
Basic Materials	2.8%	0.6%

Return for Risk

STXV vs. BGIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXV

STXV Risk / Return Rank: 90
STXV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
STXV Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
STXV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
STXV Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
STXV Martin Ratio Rank: 89

BGIG

BGIG Risk / Return Rank: 84
BGIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
BGIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
BGIG Omega Ratio Rank: 83
BGIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
BGIG Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXV vs. BGIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) and Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STXV	BGIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	2.19	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.49	3.13	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.39	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.27	3.38	+0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.49	13.05	+2.44

STXV vs. BGIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXV Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the BGIG Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXV and BGIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

STXV vs. BGIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXV drawdown since its inception was -14.80%, which is greater than BGIG's maximum drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXV and BGIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	STXV	BGIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.80%	-13.24%	-1.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.81%	-5.81%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-0.39%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.69%	-1.72%	-0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	1.50%	+0.10%

Volatility

STXV vs. BGIG - Volatility Comparison

Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) has a higher volatility of 2.82% compared to Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG) at 2.30%. This indicates that STXV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STXV	BGIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.82%	2.30%	+0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.96%	6.76%	+0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.12%	8.98%	+1.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.14%	11.83%	+1.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.14%	11.83%	+1.31%

STXV vs. BGIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BGIG's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

STXV vs. BGIG - Dividend Comparison

STXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than BGIG's 1.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BGIG Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF	1.71%	1.89%	2.02%	0.78%	0.00%
STXV Strive 1000 Value ETF	2.07%	2.37%	2.36%	2.05%	0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STXV and BGIG in my portfolio?

STXV and BGIG have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STXV or BGIG?

STXV has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to BGIG (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXV dropped -14.80% vs BGIG's -13.24%.

Which ETF is better, STXV or BGIG?

On 1-year performance, STXV leads with 25.40% vs 19.97% for BGIG. On fees, STXV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BGIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STXV or BGIG?

Over the 1-year period, STXV has performed better with a 25.40% return vs 19.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STXV or BGIG?

STXV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for BGIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STXV or BGIG?

STXV has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.71% for BGIG.

What is the main difference between STXV and BGIG?

They also come from different issuers: Strive and Bahl & Gaynor. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXV and 0.45% for BGIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STXV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.