PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STTK vs. REGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STTK vs. REGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

STTK is traded in USD, while REGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the REGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STTK achieves a 90.14% return, which is significantly higher than REGB.L's 14.96% return.


STTK

1D
1.31%
1M
16.64%
YTD
90.14%
6M
92.78%
1Y
776.48%
3Y*
30.54%
5Y*
-24.85%
10Y*

REGB.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-16.30%
YTD
14.96%
6M
13.70%
1Y
110.58%
3Y*
1.53%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STTK vs. REGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
STTK
Shattuck Labs, Inc.
90.14%201.65%-83.03%210.00%-72.97%-53.83%
REGB.L
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A
14.96%88.93%-35.64%-18.71%-31.13%-21.10%

Correlation

The correlation between STTK and REGB.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STTK vs. REGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STTK
STTK Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
STTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
STTK Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
STTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
STTK Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

REGB.L
REGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
REGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
REGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
REGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
REGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STTK vs. REGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STTKREGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.34

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

15.52

4.94

+10.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

46.03

11.91

+34.12

STTK vs. REGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STTK Sharpe Ratio is 7.69, which is higher than the REGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STTK and REGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STTK vs. REGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STTK drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, which is greater than REGB.L's maximum drawdown of -75.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STTK and REGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STTKREGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.73%

-75.84%

-22.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.51%

-22.52%

-27.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.45%

-61.39%

-32.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.95%

-38.25%

-49.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.15%

-48.37%

-34.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.00%

9.32%

+7.68%

Volatility

STTK vs. REGB.L - Volatility Comparison

Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK) has a higher volatility of 37.80% compared to VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) at 13.79%. This indicates that STTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STTKREGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.80%

13.79%

+24.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.42%

34.41%

+24.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

102.28%

47.23%

+55.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

118.14%

48.30%

+69.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

114.53%

48.30%

+66.23%

Dividends

STTK vs. REGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither STTK nor REGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


STTK and REGB.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STTK and REGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer