STTK vs. ION
STTK (Shattuck Labs, Inc.) is a stock, while ION (Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF) is Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the S&P Global Core Battery Metals Index - Benchmark TR Net. Over the past 3 years, STTK returned 45.40%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for ION. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
STTK vs. ION - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STTK achieves a 93.70% return, which is significantly higher than ION's -7.96% return.
STTK
- 1D
- -1.67%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 82.69%
- YTD
- 93.70%
- 1Y
- 865.85%
- 3Y*
- 45.40%
- 5Y*
- -20.34%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -17.82%
ION
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -7.01%
- 6M
- -17.55%
- YTD
- -7.96%
- 1Y
- 56.19%
- 3Y*
- 9.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $76.11K | $91.53K | $254.87K | |
| $6.81M | $8.79M | $7.77M |
STTK vs. ION - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STTK Shattuck Labs, Inc. | 93.70% | 201.65% | -83.03% | 210.00% | 1.32% |
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | -7.96% | 108.37% | -20.02% | -14.10% | -8.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between STTK and ION is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2022 | 0.14 |
The correlation between STTK and ION shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STTK vs. ION — Risk / Return Rank
STTK
ION
STTK vs. ION - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK) and Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STTK | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.24 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 16.56 | 1.70 | +14.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 48.47 | 4.67 | +43.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STTK vs. ION - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STTK drawdown since its inception was -98.73%, which is greater than ION's maximum drawdown of -52.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STTK and ION.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STTK | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.73% | -52.08% | -46.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.51% | -33.66% | -16.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -93.45% | -42.44% | -51.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -87.73% | -30.57% | -57.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.23% | -23.76% | -59.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.23% | 12.26% | +4.97% |
Volatility
STTK vs. ION - Volatility Comparison
Shattuck Labs, Inc. (STTK) has a higher volatility of 22.94% compared to Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF (ION) at 9.49%. This indicates that STTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ION based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STTK | ION | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.94% | 9.49% | +13.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.99% | 30.92% | +27.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 102.38% | 39.63% | +62.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 118.31% | 31.58% | +86.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.08% | 31.58% | +82.50% |
Dividends
STTK vs. ION - Dividend Comparison
STTK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ION's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ION Proshares S&P Global Core Battery Metals ETF | 1.61% | 1.63% | 1.74% | 2.23% | 0.13% |
STTK Shattuck Labs, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STTK and ION have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STTK has higher volatility (22.94%) compared to ION (9.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STTK dropped -98.73% vs ION's -52.08%.
STTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.17 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STTK and ION
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer