PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STTIX vs. BPRLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STTIX vs. BPRLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North SquareTrilogy Alternative Return Fund (STTIX) and Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund (BPRLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STTIX achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly lower than BPRLX's 5.08% return.


STTIX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.40%
YTD
0.10%
6M
-0.26%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
0.08%
10Y*
1.73%

BPRLX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.67%
YTD
5.08%
6M
5.70%
1Y
13.20%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STTIX vs. BPRLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STTIX
North SquareTrilogy Alternative Return Fund
0.10%6.66%5.94%-1.89%-10.52%4.57%7.19%3.44%-6.48%0.87%
BPRLX
Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund
5.08%11.18%31.86%19.10%-7.52%9.62%9.48%18.01%-2.47%2.13%

Correlation

The correlation between STTIX and BPRLX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2017

0.28

The correlation between STTIX and BPRLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.32 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STTIX vs. BPRLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STTIX
STTIX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
STTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
STTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
STTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
STTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

BPRLX
BPRLX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BPRLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPRLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPRLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BPRLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPRLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STTIX vs. BPRLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North SquareTrilogy Alternative Return Fund (STTIX) and Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund (BPRLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STTIXBPRLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.61

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

3.29

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.82

20.03

-15.21

STTIX vs. BPRLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STTIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the BPRLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STTIX and BPRLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STTIXBPRLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

2.65

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.77

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.71

-0.47

Drawdowns

STTIX vs. BPRLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STTIX drawdown since its inception was -18.71%, smaller than the maximum BPRLX drawdown of -24.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STTIX and BPRLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STTIXBPRLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.71%

-24.28%

+5.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-4.12%

+1.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.10%

-11.63%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.71%

-24.28%

+5.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.30%

0.00%

-6.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-4.11%

-0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

0.68%

+0.28%

Volatility

STTIX vs. BPRLX - Volatility Comparison

North SquareTrilogy Alternative Return Fund (STTIX) has a higher volatility of 1.31% compared to Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund (BPRLX) at 0.69%. This indicates that STTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BPRLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STTIXBPRLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

0.69%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.55%

4.28%

-1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.65%

5.14%

-1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.83%

15.96%

-6.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.81%

15.06%

-7.25%

STTIX vs. BPRLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STTIX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than BPRLX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

STTIX vs. BPRLX - Dividend Comparison

STTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, less than BPRLX's 11.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPRLX
Beacon Planned Return Strategy Fund
11.94%12.54%32.86%5.82%0.00%14.20%5.09%6.68%8.70%0.32%0.00%0.00%
STTIX
North SquareTrilogy Alternative Return Fund
4.69%4.26%17.39%2.10%1.03%0.49%1.02%1.68%1.73%0.96%0.99%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


STTIX and BPRLX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STTIX has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to BPRLX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STTIX dropped -18.71% vs BPRLX's -24.28%.

BPRLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STTIX and BPRLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer