STSVX vs. SSLCX
STSVX (BNY Mellon Small Cap Value Fund) and SSLCX (DWS Small Cap Core Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, STSVX returned 9.96%/yr vs 11.06%/yr for SSLCX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STSVX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SSLCX.
Performance
STSVX vs. SSLCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STSVX achieves a 20.74% return, which is significantly higher than SSLCX's 13.52% return. Over the past 10 years, STSVX has underperformed SSLCX with an annualized return of 9.96%, while SSLCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.06% annualized return.
STSVX
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 20.74%
- 6M
- 18.43%
- 1Y
- 32.09%
- 3Y*
- 13.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
SSLCX
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 2.84%
- YTD
- 13.52%
- 6M
- 11.61%
- 1Y
- 18.30%
- 3Y*
- 13.23%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.06%
STSVX vs. SSLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STSVX BNY Mellon Small Cap Value Fund | 20.74% | 8.27% | 5.04% | 6.86% | -9.05% | 24.73% | 4.21% | 24.54% | -8.69% | 10.60% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 13.52% | 4.99% | 9.85% | 13.09% | -13.53% | 41.16% | 14.65% | 21.72% | -14.28% | 11.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between STSVX and SSLCX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001 | 0.95 |
The correlation between STSVX and SSLCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STSVX vs. SSLCX — Risk / Return Rank
STSVX
SSLCX
STSVX vs. SSLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Small Cap Value Fund (STSVX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STSVX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.22 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 2.06 | +1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.75 | 6.45 | +4.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STSVX vs. SSLCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STSVX drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, smaller than the maximum SSLCX drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STSVX and SSLCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STSVX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.05% | -63.14% | +5.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.45% | -8.78% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.50% | -17.34% | -10.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.50% | -22.57% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.41% | -48.07% | +4.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.54% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -11.29% | +2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 2.79% | +0.22% |
Volatility
STSVX vs. SSLCX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Small Cap Value Fund (STSVX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) have volatilities of 5.39% and 5.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STSVX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.39% | 5.33% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.18% | 10.78% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.28% | 14.84% | +2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 17.39% | +3.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.73% | 21.08% | +1.65% |
STSVX vs. SSLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
STSVX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
STSVX vs. SSLCX - Dividend Comparison
STSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.56%, more than SSLCX's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.52% | 0.68% | 1.07% | 1.67% | 0.35% | 0.16% | 5.99% | 5.78% | 0.60% | 8.42% |
STSVX BNY Mellon Small Cap Value Fund | 31.56% | 38.10% | 13.68% | 4.85% | 9.08% | 12.78% | 0.77% | 8.24% | 16.03% | 18.50% | 8.41% | 9.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STSVX and SSLCX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STSVX has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to SSLCX (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STSVX dropped -58.05% vs SSLCX's -63.14%.
STSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STSVX and SSLCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer