PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STSVX vs. FTMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STSVX vs. FTMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Small Cap Value Fund (STSVX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund (FTMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STSVX achieves a 22.55% return, which is significantly lower than FTMSX's 30.85% return.


STSVX

1D
0.57%
1M
1.97%
6M
15.32%
YTD
22.55%
1Y
28.60%
3Y*
12.81%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
9.68%

FTMSX

1D
1.44%
1M
5.29%
6M
23.08%
YTD
30.85%
1Y
42.42%
3Y*
12.18%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STSVX vs. FTMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
STSVX
BNY Mellon Small Cap Value Fund
22.55%8.27%5.04%6.86%-9.05%24.73%4.21%23.98%
FTMSX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund
30.85%0.30%3.88%13.11%-31.07%37.45%15.58%17.82%

Correlation

The correlation between STSVX and FTMSX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2019

0.87

The correlation between STSVX and FTMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STSVX vs. FTMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STSVX
STSVX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
STSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
STSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
STSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
STSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

FTMSX
FTMSX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FTMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FTMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STSVX vs. FTMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Small Cap Value Fund (STSVX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund (FTMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STSVXFTMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.26

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

2.26

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

8.35

+0.23

STSVX vs. FTMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STSVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is comparable to the FTMSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STSVX and FTMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STSVX vs. FTMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STSVX drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, which is greater than FTMSX's maximum drawdown of -53.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STSVX and FTMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STSVXFTMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.05%

-53.12%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.45%

-17.52%

+8.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.50%

-35.01%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.50%

-48.67%

+21.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-2.83%

+1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.82%

-22.06%

+13.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

4.73%

-1.71%

Volatility

STSVX vs. FTMSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Small Cap Value Fund (STSVX) is 3.75%, while Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund (FTMSX) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that STSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STSVXFTMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

6.96%

-3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.13%

18.08%

-5.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.20%

25.84%

-8.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.64%

28.12%

-7.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.66%

30.47%

-7.81%

STSVX vs. FTMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STSVX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than FTMSX's 2.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

STSVX vs. FTMSX - Dividend Comparison

STSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.09%, while FTMSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTMSX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Micro-Cap Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%0.12%0.00%0.00%8.27%0.37%4.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STSVX
BNY Mellon Small Cap Value Fund
31.09%38.10%13.68%4.85%9.08%12.78%0.77%8.24%16.03%18.50%8.41%9.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


STSVX and FTMSX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTMSX has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to STSVX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STSVX dropped -58.05% vs FTMSX's -53.12%.

FTMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STSVX and FTMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer