PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STSGX vs. NESIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STSGX vs. NESIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Beacon Stephens Small Cap Growth Fund (STSGX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STSGX achieves a 11.04% return, which is significantly lower than NESIX's 53.35% return.


STSGX

1D
1.36%
1M
-5.11%
6M
6.95%
YTD
11.04%
1Y
20.59%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
4.57%
10Y*
11.30%
ALL TIME*
9.01%

NESIX

1D
5.20%
1M
-10.40%
6M
37.70%
YTD
53.35%
1Y
75.27%
3Y*
24.27%
5Y*
5.79%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

STSGX vs. NESIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STSGX
American Beacon Stephens Small Cap Growth Fund
11.04%11.67%15.45%19.21%-28.91%14.26%37.45%22.54%1.72%19.23%
NESIX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional
53.35%11.16%13.47%5.85%-29.71%11.36%73.06%55.28%-4.87%12.63%

Correlation

The correlation between STSGX and NESIX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.83

The correlation between STSGX and NESIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STSGX vs. NESIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

STSGX
STSGX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
STSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
STSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
STSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
STSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

NESIX
NESIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
NESIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NESIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
NESIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
NESIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NESIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

STSGX vs. NESIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Beacon Stephens Small Cap Growth Fund (STSGX) and Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STSGXNESIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.31

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

3.05

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.67

11.98

-7.30

STSGX vs. NESIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STSGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the NESIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STSGX and NESIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STSGX vs. NESIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STSGX drawdown since its inception was -56.50%, which is greater than NESIX's maximum drawdown of -49.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STSGX and NESIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STSGXNESIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.50%

-49.61%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.89%

-22.10%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.81%

-35.21%

+10.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.43%

-49.61%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.04%

-18.05%

+12.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.65%

-14.87%

+3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

5.66%

-1.84%

Volatility

STSGX vs. NESIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Beacon Stephens Small Cap Growth Fund (STSGX) is 4.75%, while Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional (NESIX) has a volatility of 13.35%. This indicates that STSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NESIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STSGXNESIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.75%

13.35%

-8.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.41%

26.14%

-10.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.56%

34.33%

-13.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.09%

30.18%

-7.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.79%

26.86%

-4.07%

STSGX vs. NESIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STSGX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NESIX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

STSGX vs. NESIX - Dividend Comparison

STSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.38%, while NESIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NESIX
Needham Small Cap Growth Fund Institutional
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.93%23.92%13.26%8.25%21.96%8.89%0.00%0.00%
STSGX
American Beacon Stephens Small Cap Growth Fund
10.38%11.53%8.27%1.52%15.04%23.70%11.41%11.76%45.22%3.68%0.88%5.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


STSGX and NESIX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NESIX has higher volatility (13.35%) compared to STSGX (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STSGX dropped -56.50% vs NESIX's -49.61%.

NESIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STSGX and NESIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer