STRK vs. BINC
STRK (MicroStrategy Incorporated) is a stock, while BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) is Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. Over the past year, STRK returned -30.62% vs 5.62% for BINC. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STRK vs. BINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STRK achieves a -11.11% return, which is significantly lower than BINC's 0.92% return.
STRK
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -12.50%
- YTD
- -11.11%
- 6M
- -17.63%
- 1Y
- -30.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BINC
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 5.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STRK vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STRK MicroStrategy Incorporated | -11.11% | 0.61% |
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 0.92% | 6.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between STRK and BINC is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STRK vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank
STRK
BINC
STRK vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroStrategy Incorporated (STRK) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STRK | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.50 | -0.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 2.10 | -2.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 8.26 | -9.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STRK | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.86 | 2.48 | -3.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.23 | 2.36 | -2.60 |
Drawdowns
STRK vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STRK drawdown since its inception was -41.90%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRK and BINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STRK | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.90% | -2.69% | -39.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.90% | -2.69% | -39.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.81% | -0.47% | -41.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.78% | -0.36% | -21.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.71% | 0.68% | +28.03% |
Volatility
STRK vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison
MicroStrategy Incorporated (STRK) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 0.75%. This indicates that STRK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STRK | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 0.75% | +4.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.16% | 1.84% | +20.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.55% | 2.28% | +33.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.03% | 3.00% | +32.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.03% | 3.00% | +32.03% |
Dividends
STRK vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison
STRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.72%, more than BINC's 5.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 5.86% | 5.86% | 6.14% | 3.13% |
STRK MicroStrategy Incorporated | 11.72% | 9.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STRK and BINC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STRK has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to BINC (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRK dropped -41.90% vs BINC's -2.69%.
BINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STRK and BINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer