STPL.TO vs. ZEB.TO
STPL.TO (BMO Global Consumer Staples Hedged to CAD Index ETF) and ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STPL.TO is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex Korea Consumer Staples Capped 100% Hedged to CAD Index, while ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, STPL.TO returned 2.70%/yr vs 18.18%/yr for ZEB.TO. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. STPL.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ZEB.TO.
Performance
STPL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STPL.TO achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than ZEB.TO's 19.22% return.
STPL.TO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- -1.93%
- 3Y*
- 2.61%
- 5Y*
- 2.70%
- 10Y*
- —
ZEB.TO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- YTD
- 19.22%
- 6M
- 24.72%
- 1Y
- 60.22%
- 3Y*
- 32.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.18%
- 10Y*
- 15.82%
STPL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STPL.TO BMO Global Consumer Staples Hedged to CAD Index ETF | 1.23% | 5.53% | 2.99% | -2.50% | -0.24% | 15.26% | 0.98% | 24.54% | -10.98% | 4.78% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 19.22% | 43.43% | 24.58% | 10.87% | -10.38% | 39.38% | 3.52% | 16.06% | -8.85% | 9.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between STPL.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2017 | 0.32 |
The correlation between STPL.TO and ZEB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
STPL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STPL.TO
ZEB.TO
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
STPL.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Healthcare
STPL.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Basic Materials
STPL.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
STPL.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Industrials
STPL.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Communication Services
STPL.TO
-
ZEB.TO
-
Energy
STPL.TO
-
ZEB.TO
-
Financial Services
STPL.TO
-
ZEB.TO
Real Estate
STPL.TO
-
ZEB.TO
-
Technology
STPL.TO
-
ZEB.TO
-
Utilities
STPL.TO
-
ZEB.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STPL.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
STPL.TO
ZEB.TO
STPL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Global Consumer Staples Hedged to CAD Index ETF (STPL.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STPL.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.90 | -0.92 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 7.17 | -7.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | 30.84 | -31.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STPL.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 | 4.79 | -4.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 1.35 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.88 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
STPL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STPL.TO drawdown since its inception was -23.82%, smaller than the maximum ZEB.TO drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STPL.TO and ZEB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STPL.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.82% | -39.69% | +15.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.44% | -8.44% | -2.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.44% | -14.80% | +4.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.06% | -25.97% | +13.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.69% | -2.00% | -7.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -5.65% | +1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | 1.96% | +2.84% |
Volatility
STPL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BMO Global Consumer Staples Hedged to CAD Index ETF (STPL.TO) is 4.14%, while BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that STPL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STPL.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 4.89% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.64% | 11.14% | -1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.88% | 12.62% | -0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.74% | 13.52% | -1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.75% | 16.91% | -4.16% |
STPL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
STPL.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEB.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
STPL.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison
STPL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than ZEB.TO's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STPL.TO BMO Global Consumer Staples Hedged to CAD Index ETF | 2.17% | 2.22% | 2.42% | 2.43% | 2.32% | 2.10% | 2.18% | 2.02% | 2.30% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.54% | 2.95% | 3.98% | 4.75% | 4.29% | 3.13% | 4.15% | 3.65% | 3.64% | 3.02% | 3.19% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STPL.TO and ZEB.TO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZEB.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZEB.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for STPL.TO.
STPL.TO is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while ZEB.TO is Financials Equities. STPL.TO tracks FTSE Developed ex Korea Consumer Staples Capped 100% Hedged to CAD Index, while ZEB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for STPL.TO and 0.25% for ZEB.TO.
Find the right allocation for STPL.TO and ZEB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer