PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STOR.AS vs. VNM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STOR.AS vs. VNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Energy Storage & Hydrogen UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (STOR.AS) and VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STOR.AS achieves a 75.53% return, which is significantly higher than VNM's -3.80% return.


STOR.AS

1D
-3.37%
1M
-7.07%
YTD
75.53%
6M
73.71%
1Y
143.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VNM

1D
1.07%
1M
-1.74%
YTD
-3.80%
6M
-0.24%
1Y
33.96%
3Y*
12.46%
5Y*
-0.83%
10Y*
3.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STOR.AS vs. VNM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between STOR.AS and VNM is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2025

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STOR.AS vs. VNM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STOR.AS
STOR.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
STOR.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STOR.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STOR.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STOR.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
STOR.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

VNM
VNM Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
VNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNM Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
VNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNM Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STOR.AS vs. VNM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Energy Storage & Hydrogen UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (STOR.AS) and VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STOR.ASVNMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.23

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.25

2.07

+8.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

29.02

5.04

+23.99

STOR.AS vs. VNM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STOR.AS Sharpe Ratio is 4.47, which is higher than the VNM Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STOR.AS and VNM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STOR.AS vs. VNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STOR.AS drawdown since its inception was -20.12%, smaller than the maximum VNM drawdown of -63.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STOR.AS and VNM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STOR.ASVNMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.12%

-63.19%

+43.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.79%

-17.07%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.14%

-25.08%

+13.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-37.78%

+33.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

6.99%

-2.09%

Volatility

STOR.AS vs. VNM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Energy Storage & Hydrogen UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (STOR.AS) has a higher volatility of 13.61% compared to VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF (VNM) at 6.32%. This indicates that STOR.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STOR.ASVNMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.61%

6.32%

+7.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.68%

17.90%

+7.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.64%

26.91%

+4.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.57%

24.34%

+8.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.57%

23.45%

+9.12%

STOR.AS vs. VNM - Expense Ratio Comparison

STOR.AS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than VNM's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

STOR.AS vs. VNM - Dividend Comparison

STOR.AS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
STOR.AS
iShares Energy Storage & Hydrogen UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VNM
VanEck Vectors Vietnam ETF
0.21%0.20%0.00%5.21%0.96%0.49%0.40%0.76%0.83%1.14%2.44%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


STOR.AS and VNM have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, STOR.AS is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

STOR.AS is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for VNM.

STOR.AS is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while VNM is Asia Pacific Equities. STOR.AS tracks STOXX Global Energy Storage and Hydrogen Index, while VNM tracks MVIS Vietnam Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for STOR.AS and 0.68% for VNM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STOR.AS and VNM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer