PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STN vs. UPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STN vs. UPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stantec Inc (STN) and United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STN achieves a -23.15% return, which is significantly lower than UPS's 12.37% return. Over the past 10 years, STN has outperformed UPS with an annualized return of 12.59%, while UPS has yielded a comparatively lower 4.31% annualized return.


STN

1D
0.33%
1M
-7.28%
YTD
-23.15%
6M
-22.43%
1Y
-32.48%
3Y*
5.99%
5Y*
11.02%
10Y*
12.59%

UPS

1D
-0.51%
1M
11.65%
YTD
12.37%
6M
10.44%
1Y
14.48%
3Y*
-9.66%
5Y*
-7.78%
10Y*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STN vs. UPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STN
Stantec Inc
-23.15%21.08%-1.44%68.90%-13.76%75.67%16.56%31.83%-20.43%12.80%
UPS
United Parcel Service, Inc.
12.37%-15.93%-15.93%-5.96%-16.21%30.02%48.64%24.24%-15.48%7.14%

Correlation

The correlation between STN and UPS is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2005

0.31

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STN:

$8.24B

UPS:

$91.89B

EPS

STN:

CA$3.98

UPS:

$6.18

PE Ratio

STN:

25.36

UPS:

17.49

PS Ratio

STN:

1.48

UPS:

1.04

PB Ratio

STN:

3.40

UPS:

5.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

STN:

CA$7.77B

UPS:

$88.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

STN:

CA$3.11B

UPS:

$16.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

STN:

CA$1.05B

UPS:

$10.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STN vs. UPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STN
STN Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
STN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STN Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
STN Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
STN Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
STN Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

UPS
UPS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
UPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPS Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
UPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPS Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STN vs. UPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stantec Inc (STN) and United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STNUPSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.12

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.88

0.72

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.00

1.22

-3.22

STN vs. UPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STN Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is lower than the UPS Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STN and UPS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STN vs. UPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STN drawdown since its inception was -67.42%, which is greater than UPS's maximum drawdown of -57.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STN and UPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STNUPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.42%

-57.92%

-9.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.93%

-20.28%

-16.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.93%

-50.71%

+13.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.93%

-57.92%

+20.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.93%

-57.92%

+20.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.11%

-42.22%

+6.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.12%

-15.33%

-1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.27%

11.93%

+4.34%

Volatility

STN vs. UPS - Volatility Comparison

Stantec Inc (STN) has a higher volatility of 11.50% compared to United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) at 9.06%. This indicates that STN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UPS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STNUPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.50%

9.06%

+2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.17%

21.69%

+2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.91%

29.72%

-1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.27%

28.46%

-3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.65%

27.61%

-1.96%

Dividends

STN vs. UPS - Dividend Comparison

STN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than UPS's 6.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
STN
Stantec Inc
1.09%0.69%0.78%0.79%1.14%1.17%1.42%1.55%1.91%1.79%1.78%1.69%
UPS
United Parcel Service, Inc.
6.07%6.61%5.17%4.12%3.50%1.90%2.40%3.28%3.73%2.79%2.72%3.03%

Financials

STN vs. UPS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stantec Inc and United Parcel Service, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
2.07B
21.20B
(STN) Total Revenue
(UPS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. STN values in CAD, UPS values in USD

STN vs. UPS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Stantec Inc and United Parcel Service, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
39.6%
17.0%
Portfolio components
STN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc reported a gross profit of 821.42M and revenue of 2.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

UPS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.60B and revenue of 21.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.0%.

STN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc reported an operating income of 175.05M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.

UPS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.0%.

STN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc reported a net income of 111.09M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.

UPS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Parcel Service, Inc. reported a net income of 864.00M and revenue of 21.20B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


STN and UPS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STN has higher volatility (11.50%) compared to UPS (9.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STN dropped -67.42% vs UPS's -57.92%.

UPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STN and UPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer