STLFX vs. FRBEX
STLFX (BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund) and FRBEX (Fidelity Freedom 2070 Fund Class K) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past year, STLFX returned 28.27% vs 31.12% for FRBEX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STLFX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FRBEX.
Performance
STLFX vs. FRBEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STLFX achieves a 13.13% return, which is significantly lower than FRBEX's 13.88% return.
STLFX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 13.13%
- 6M
- 14.07%
- 1Y
- 28.27%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 8.54%
- 10Y*
- 11.19%
FRBEX
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 5.17%
- YTD
- 13.88%
- 6M
- 15.74%
- 1Y
- 31.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STLFX vs. FRBEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
STLFX BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund | 13.13% | 20.03% | -4.90% |
FRBEX Fidelity Freedom 2070 Fund Class K | 13.88% | 23.38% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between STLFX and FRBEX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between STLFX and FRBEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STLFX vs. FRBEX — Risk / Return Rank
STLFX
FRBEX
STLFX vs. FRBEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund (STLFX) and Fidelity Freedom 2070 Fund Class K (FRBEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STLFX | FRBEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.46 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.25 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.18 | 14.39 | -1.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STLFX | FRBEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.13 | 2.48 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 1.40 | -0.99 |
Drawdowns
STLFX vs. FRBEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STLFX drawdown since its inception was -50.35%, which is greater than FRBEX's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLFX and FRBEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STLFX | FRBEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.35% | -15.31% | -35.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.45% | -9.79% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -1.79% | -4.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 2.20% | -0.04% |
Volatility
STLFX vs. FRBEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund (STLFX) is 3.88%, while Fidelity Freedom 2070 Fund Class K (FRBEX) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that STLFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRBEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STLFX | FRBEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 4.34% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.69% | 10.55% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.41% | 12.80% | +0.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.86% | 15.82% | +1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 15.82% | +0.60% |
STLFX vs. FRBEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
STLFX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FRBEX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
STLFX vs. FRBEX - Dividend Comparison
STLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than FRBEX's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRBEX Fidelity Freedom 2070 Fund Class K | 4.11% | 2.38% | 2.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STLFX BlackRock LifePath Dynamic 2050 Fund | 5.48% | 6.20% | 1.86% | 2.91% | 2.51% | 16.88% | 2.27% | 6.09% | 15.73% | 5.87% | 2.00% | 9.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, STLFX and FRBEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FRBEX has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to STLFX (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STLFX dropped -50.35% vs FRBEX's -15.31%.
FRBEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STLFX and FRBEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer