PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STHS.L vs. SSHY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STHS.L vs. SSHY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc (STHS.L) and PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STHS.L achieves a 2.04% return, which is significantly higher than SSHY.L's 1.37% return. Over the past 10 years, STHS.L has underperformed SSHY.L with an annualized return of 4.33%, while SSHY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 5.06% annualized return.


STHS.L

1D
0.53%
1M
0.52%
6M
1.70%
YTD
2.04%
1Y
6.24%
3Y*
8.15%
5Y*
4.75%
10Y*
4.33%

SSHY.L

1D
-0.54%
1M
-0.43%
6M
0.80%
YTD
1.37%
1Y
5.38%
3Y*
7.23%
5Y*
5.59%
10Y*
5.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STHS.L vs. SSHY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STHS.L
PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc
2.04%8.53%8.27%10.62%-5.62%4.05%1.89%8.01%-2.38%4.36%
SSHY.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist
1.37%1.40%10.17%5.50%6.56%5.71%0.33%6.66%5.06%-3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between STHS.L and SSHY.L is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2015

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STHS.L vs. SSHY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STHS.L
STHS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
STHS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STHS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
STHS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
STHS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
STHS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SSHY.L
SSHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SSHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STHS.L vs. SSHY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc (STHS.L) and PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STHS.LSSHY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.16

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

1.47

+2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.46

4.39

+10.07

STHS.L vs. SSHY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STHS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the SSHY.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STHS.L and SSHY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STHS.L vs. SSHY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STHS.L drawdown since its inception was -22.74%, smaller than the maximum SSHY.L drawdown of -38.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STHS.L and SSHY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STHS.LSSHY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.74%

-38.26%

+15.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.84%

-3.64%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.34%

-9.91%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.53%

-10.25%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.74%

-15.95%

-6.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.40%

+2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.66%

-11.52%

+9.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

1.22%

-0.77%

Volatility

STHS.L vs. SSHY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc (STHS.L) is 1.05%, while PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L) has a volatility of 1.81%. This indicates that STHS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSHY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STHS.LSSHY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.05%

1.81%

-0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.88%

4.13%

-1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.52%

5.76%

-2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.32%

7.59%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.73%

8.71%

-1.98%

Dividends

STHS.L vs. SSHY.L - Dividend Comparison

STHS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.47%, more than SSHY.L's 7.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSHY.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist
7.01%7.33%7.48%6.52%4.86%4.47%5.24%5.27%5.10%5.48%4.92%5.11%
STHS.L
PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc
7.47%7.11%7.57%6.39%4.95%4.52%4.92%5.08%5.34%5.18%5.43%0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


STHS.L and SSHY.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STHS.L tracks PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Hedged) Inc, while SSHY.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STHS.L and SSHY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer