STHE.L vs. IHYA.L
STHE.L (PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Inc EUR Hedged) and IHYA.L (iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both High Yield Bonds funds - STHE.L tracks the ICE BofA 0-5 Year US High Yield Constrained Index while IHYA.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, STHE.L returned 3.23%/yr vs 4.96%/yr for IHYA.L. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. STHE.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IHYA.L.
Performance
STHE.L vs. IHYA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
STHE.L is traded in EUR, while IHYA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IHYA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STHE.L achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than IHYA.L's 2.25% return.
STHE.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 5.01%
- 3Y*
- 6.71%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- 3.35%
IHYA.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- 5.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.96%
- 10Y*
- —
STHE.L vs. IHYA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STHE.L PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Inc EUR Hedged | 0.74% | 6.43% | 6.85% | 8.96% | -6.98% | 3.51% | 1.79% | 6.81% | -3.40% | 1.54% |
IHYA.L iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.25% | -3.50% | 14.05% | 7.32% | -3.22% | 11.48% | -3.59% | 15.17% | 3.33% | -8.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between STHE.L and IHYA.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2017 | 0.39 |
Over the past year, the correlation between STHE.L and IHYA.L has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
STHE.L vs. IHYA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STHE.L
IHYA.L
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
STHE.L
IHYA.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
STHE.L
IHYA.L
-
Industrials
STHE.L
IHYA.L
-
Real Estate
STHE.L
IHYA.L
Financial Services
STHE.L
IHYA.L
-
Technology
STHE.L
IHYA.L
-
Energy
STHE.L
IHYA.L
-
Healthcare
STHE.L
IHYA.L
-
Basic Materials
STHE.L
IHYA.L
-
Utilities
STHE.L
IHYA.L
Consumer Defensive
STHE.L
IHYA.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STHE.L vs. IHYA.L — Risk / Return Rank
STHE.L
IHYA.L
STHE.L vs. IHYA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Inc EUR Hedged (STHE.L) and iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IHYA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STHE.L | IHYA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.15 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 1.43 | +0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.63 | 4.75 | +4.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STHE.L | IHYA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.69 | 0.81 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.59 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.36 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
STHE.L vs. IHYA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STHE.L drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, which is greater than IHYA.L's maximum drawdown of -21.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STHE.L and IHYA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STHE.L | IHYA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.40% | -21.83% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.16% | -3.57% | +1.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.02% | -11.75% | +6.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.27% | -11.75% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.37% | +3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -4.44% | +2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.52% | 1.08% | -0.56% |
Volatility
STHE.L vs. IHYA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Inc EUR Hedged (STHE.L) is 0.86%, while iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IHYA.L) has a volatility of 1.50%. This indicates that STHE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHYA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STHE.L | IHYA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.86% | 1.50% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.24% | 4.52% | -2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.95% | 6.32% | -3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.36% | 8.39% | -3.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.74% | 9.45% | -2.71% |
STHE.L vs. IHYA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
STHE.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IHYA.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
STHE.L vs. IHYA.L - Dividend Comparison
STHE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.08%, while IHYA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHYA.L iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STHE.L PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Inc EUR Hedged | 7.08% | 7.17% | 7.64% | 6.27% | 4.99% | 4.57% | 4.88% | 5.14% | 5.37% | 5.18% | 5.41% | 5.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STHE.L and IHYA.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IHYA.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IHYA.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for STHE.L.
STHE.L tracks ICE BofA 0-5 Year US High Yield Constrained Index, while IHYA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for STHE.L and 0.50% for IHYA.L.
Find the right allocation for STHE.L and IHYA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer