STEN vs. BTEK

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

STEN (iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF) and BTEK (Future Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STEN is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by BlackRock, while BTEK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. STEN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for BTEK.

Performance

STEN vs. BTEK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF (STEN) and Future Tech ETF (BTEK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

STEN

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 2.98%
• YTD: 8.04%
• 6M: 8.44%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTEK

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STEN vs. BTEK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
STEN iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF	8.04%	2.05%
BTEK Future Tech ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Return for Risk

STEN vs. BTEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF (STEN) and Future Tech ETF (BTEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STEN	BTEK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.70	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	STEN	BTEK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.07%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.92%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	STEN	BTEK	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.22%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.22%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.22%	—	—

STEN vs. BTEK - Expense Ratio Comparison

STEN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BTEK's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

STEN vs. BTEK - Dividend Comparison

STEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while BTEK has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BTEK Future Tech ETF	0.00%	0.00%
STEN iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF	0.29%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, STEN or BTEK?

On fees, STEN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, STEN or BTEK?

STEN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for BTEK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STEN or BTEK?

STEN has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for BTEK.

What is the main difference between STEN and BTEK?

STEN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BTEK is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for STEN and 0.88% for BTEK.