STEN vs. BRTR
STEN (iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF) and BRTR (Blackrock Total Return ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STEN is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by BlackRock, while BRTR is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. STEN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for BRTR.
Performance
STEN vs. BRTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STEN achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly higher than BRTR's 0.51% return.
STEN
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 2.98%
- YTD
- 8.04%
- 6M
- 8.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRTR
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 0.61%
- 1Y
- 5.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STEN vs. BRTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
STEN iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF | 8.04% | 2.05% |
BRTR Blackrock Total Return ETF | 0.51% | 0.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between STEN and BRTR is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STEN vs. BRTR — Risk / Return Rank
STEN
BRTR
STEN vs. BRTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF (STEN) and Blackrock Total Return ETF (BRTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STEN | BRTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.70 | 0.89 | +0.81 |
Drawdowns
STEN vs. BRTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STEN drawdown since its inception was -6.21%, which is greater than BRTR's maximum drawdown of -5.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STEN and BRTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STEN | BRTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.21% | -5.07% | -1.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.07% | -1.58% | +1.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -1.35% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.08% | — |
Volatility
STEN vs. BRTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STEN | BRTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.22% | 3.68% | +5.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.22% | 4.69% | +4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.22% | 4.69% | +4.53% |
STEN vs. BRTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
STEN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BRTR's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
STEN vs. BRTR - Dividend Comparison
STEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than BRTR's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BRTR Blackrock Total Return ETF | 4.72% | 4.86% | 5.58% | 0.22% |
STEN iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF | 0.29% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STEN and BRTR have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRTR is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRTR is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for STEN.
BRTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 0.29% for STEN.
STEN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BRTR is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for STEN and 0.38% for BRTR.
Find the right allocation for STEN and BRTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer