STEN vs. BLCR

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

STEN (iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF) and BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STEN is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by BlackRock, while BLCR is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STEN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for BLCR.

Performance

STEN vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF (STEN) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STEN achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 18.43% return.

STEN

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 2.21%
• 6M: 7.40%
• YTD: 8.76%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BLCR

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 2.22%
• 6M: 15.03%
• YTD: 18.43%
• 1Y: 38.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STEN vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
STEN iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF	8.76%	2.36%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	18.43%	5.75%

Correlation

The correlation between STEN and BLCR is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025	0.90

Return for Risk

STEN vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STEN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 86
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 83
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STEN vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF (STEN) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STEN	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.30	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.07	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.70	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.38	—

Drawdowns

STEN vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STEN drawdown since its inception was -6.21%, smaller than the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STEN and BLCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	STEN	BLCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.21%	-21.29%	+15.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.32%	+1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.91%	-2.19%	+1.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.31%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	STEN	BLCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.96%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.30%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.28%	16.51%	-7.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.28%	17.63%	-8.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.28%	17.63%	-8.35%

STEN vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

STEN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

STEN vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

STEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, more than BLCR's 0.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.28%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%
STEN iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF	0.29%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STEN and BLCR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, STEN and BLCR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, STEN or BLCR?

On fees, BLCR is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, STEN or BLCR?

BLCR is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for STEN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STEN or BLCR?

STEN and BLCR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.29%.

What is the main difference between STEN and BLCR?

STEN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BLCR is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for STEN and 0.36% for BLCR.