STBQ vs. WGMI

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

STBQ (Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF) and WGMI (CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STBQ is a Blockchain fund managed by Amplify, while WGMI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by CoinShares. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

STBQ vs. WGMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF (STBQ) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STBQ achieves a -19.28% return, which is significantly lower than WGMI's 64.80% return.

STBQ

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -6.80%
• YTD: -19.28%
• 6M: -19.82%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WGMI

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: -7.37%
• YTD: 64.80%
• 6M: 64.80%
• 1Y: 177.35%
• 3Y*: 69.56%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STBQ vs. WGMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
STBQ Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF	-19.28%	-1.97%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	64.80%	-9.27%

Correlation

The correlation between STBQ and WGMI is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2025	0.68

Return for Risk

STBQ vs. WGMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STBQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WGMI

WGMI Risk / Return Rank: 69
WGMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
WGMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
WGMI Omega Ratio Rank: 61
WGMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
WGMI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STBQ vs. WGMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF (STBQ) and CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF (WGMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STBQ	WGMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.34	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.66	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.50	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.08	—

Drawdowns

STBQ vs. WGMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STBQ drawdown since its inception was -33.10%, smaller than the maximum WGMI drawdown of -85.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STBQ and WGMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	STBQ	WGMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.10%	-85.76%	+52.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-50.94%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-62.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.68%	-12.52%	-14.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.05%	-42.28%	+23.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	25.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	STBQ	WGMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	21.09%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	54.89%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.26%	76.31%	-33.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.26%	81.41%	-38.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.26%	81.41%	-38.15%

Dividends

STBQ vs. WGMI - Dividend Comparison

Neither STBQ nor WGMI has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
STBQ Amplify Stablecoin Technology Leaders ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WGMI CoinShares Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STBQ and WGMI in my portfolio?

STBQ and WGMI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STBQ or WGMI?

STBQ and WGMI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between STBQ and WGMI?

STBQ is categorized as Blockchain, while WGMI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and CoinShares.