PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STBNX vs. AFLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STBNX vs. AFLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sierra Tactical Bond Fund (STBNX) and Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund (AFLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STBNX achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly lower than AFLIX's 1.42% return.


STBNX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.49%
YTD
1.08%
6M
1.38%
1Y
5.51%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*

AFLIX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.87%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
2.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STBNX vs. AFLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
STBNX
Sierra Tactical Bond Fund
1.08%-0.37%6.36%6.76%-4.47%1.11%15.56%2.41%
AFLIX
Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund
1.42%5.99%5.51%7.75%-5.69%1.66%0.58%0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between STBNX and AFLIX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019

0.36

Over the past year, STBNX and AFLIX have become more correlated (0.61) than their long-term average of 0.36, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STBNX vs. AFLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STBNX
STBNX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
STBNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STBNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
STBNX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
STBNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
STBNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

AFLIX
AFLIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AFLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
AFLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STBNX vs. AFLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sierra Tactical Bond Fund (STBNX) and Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund (AFLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STBNXAFLIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.89

3.85

-1.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.85

6.22

-3.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

2.08

-0.71

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

4.12

-1.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.61

19.69

-9.08

STBNX vs. AFLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STBNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the AFLIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STBNX and AFLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STBNXAFLIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

3.85

-1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

1.50

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

1.04

-0.21

Drawdowns

STBNX vs. AFLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STBNX drawdown since its inception was -8.04%, smaller than the maximum AFLIX drawdown of -9.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STBNX and AFLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STBNXAFLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.04%

-9.43%

+1.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.44%

-1.32%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.96%

-1.38%

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.04%

-8.55%

+0.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

0.00%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-1.62%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.28%

+0.26%

Volatility

STBNX vs. AFLIX - Volatility Comparison

Sierra Tactical Bond Fund (STBNX) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund (AFLIX) at 0.55%. This indicates that STBNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STBNXAFLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

0.55%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.38%

1.17%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02%

1.41%

+1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.96%

1.98%

+1.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.95%

2.33%

+2.62%

STBNX vs. AFLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STBNX has a 1.63% expense ratio, which is higher than AFLIX's 1.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

STBNX vs. AFLIX - Dividend Comparison

STBNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.25%, more than AFLIX's 2.30% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFLIX
Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund
2.30%3.15%5.97%5.31%4.13%2.40%4.51%2.88%2.92%1.34%
STBNX
Sierra Tactical Bond Fund
5.25%4.98%5.17%4.53%1.41%2.74%6.55%0.87%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


STBNX and AFLIX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STBNX has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to AFLIX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STBNX dropped -8.04% vs AFLIX's -9.43%.

AFLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.85 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STBNX and AFLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer