PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STAX vs. HYMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STAX vs. HYMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF (STAX) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STAX achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than HYMB's 2.87% return.


STAX

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.13%
YTD
0.93%
6M
1.25%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYMB

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.19%
YTD
2.87%
6M
3.18%
1Y
7.43%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
2.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STAX vs. HYMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
STAX
Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF
0.93%4.12%2.55%1.45%
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
2.87%2.04%5.52%3.06%

Correlation

The correlation between STAX and HYMB is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023

0.65

The correlation between STAX and HYMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STAX vs. HYMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STAX
STAX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
STAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
STAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
STAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
STAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

HYMB
HYMB Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HYMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMB Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMB Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STAX vs. HYMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF (STAX) and SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STAXHYMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.99

1.37

+0.62

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

2.40

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.77

8.51

+3.26

STAX vs. HYMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.86, which is higher than the HYMB Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STAX and HYMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STAXHYMBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.86

1.84

+2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.64

0.45

+2.19

Drawdowns

STAX vs. HYMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STAX drawdown since its inception was -1.42%, smaller than the maximum HYMB drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STAX and HYMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STAXHYMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.42%

-29.57%

+28.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.05%

-3.11%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.04%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.23%

-3.81%

+3.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

0.88%

-0.55%

Volatility

STAX vs. HYMB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF (STAX) is 0.35%, while SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) has a volatility of 1.35%. This indicates that STAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STAXHYMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.35%

1.35%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.79%

3.14%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01%

4.05%

-3.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.38%

6.66%

-5.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.38%

11.36%

-9.98%

STAX vs. HYMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

STAX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than HYMB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

STAX vs. HYMB - Dividend Comparison

STAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than HYMB's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
4.54%4.55%4.29%4.07%3.77%3.19%3.55%3.95%4.03%3.78%4.08%4.54%
STAX
Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF
3.22%3.16%3.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


STAX and HYMB have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYMB has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to STAX (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STAX dropped -1.42% vs HYMB's -29.57%.

On 1-year performance, HYMB leads with 7.43% vs 3.87% for STAX. On fees, STAX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, STAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HYMB has performed better with a 7.43% return vs 3.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STAX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HYMB.

HYMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 3.22% for STAX.

They also come from different issuers: Macquarie and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for STAX and 0.35% for HYMB.

STAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STAX and HYMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer