PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STAG vs. HTGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STAG vs. HTGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STAG achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly higher than HTGC's -12.79% return. Over the past 10 years, STAG has underperformed HTGC with an annualized return of 10.66%, while HTGC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.89% annualized return.


STAG

1D
2.05%
1M
1.07%
YTD
6.64%
6M
4.38%
1Y
9.55%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
4.10%
10Y*
10.66%

HTGC

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.26%
YTD
-12.79%
6M
-12.84%
1Y
-4.63%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
13.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STAG vs. HTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STAG
STAG Industrial, Inc.
6.64%13.30%-10.34%26.73%-29.66%59.10%4.18%33.20%-3.81%20.68%
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.
-12.79%3.54%33.33%42.91%-10.42%26.50%14.49%39.86%-6.86%1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between STAG and HTGC is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2011

0.34

The correlation between STAG and HTGC shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STAG:

$7.42B

HTGC:

$3.05B

EPS

STAG:

$1.30

HTGC:

$1.49

PE Ratio

STAG:

29.92

HTGC:

10.40

PEG Ratio

STAG:

3.79

HTGC:

0.32

PS Ratio

STAG:

8.45

HTGC:

5.21

PB Ratio

STAG:

2.07

HTGC:

1.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

STAG:

$863.82M

HTGC:

$578.18M

Gross Profit (TTM)

STAG:

$356.54M

HTGC:

$510.74M

EBITDA (TTM)

STAG:

$598.36M

HTGC:

$380.44M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STAG vs. HTGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STAG
STAG Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
STAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
STAG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
STAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
STAG Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

HTGC
HTGC Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
HTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
HTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STAG vs. HTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) and Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STAGHTGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.99

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

-0.19

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.49

-0.42

+2.91

STAG vs. HTGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STAG Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the HTGC Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STAG and HTGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STAG vs. HTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STAG drawdown since its inception was -45.08%, smaller than the maximum HTGC drawdown of -68.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STAG and HTGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STAGHTGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.08%

-68.21%

+23.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-24.74%

+15.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.59%

-27.97%

+3.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.22%

-36.11%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.08%

-57.54%

+12.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.43%

-17.54%

+14.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.50%

-10.87%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

10.98%

-7.13%

Volatility

STAG vs. HTGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) is 5.63%, while Hercules Capital, Inc. (HTGC) has a volatility of 5.93%. This indicates that STAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STAGHTGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

5.93%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.90%

20.04%

-6.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.50%

23.30%

-3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.42%

25.74%

-2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.17%

27.84%

-1.67%

Dividends

STAG vs. HTGC - Dividend Comparison

STAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than HTGC's 11.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HTGC
Hercules Capital, Inc.
11.68%9.99%9.56%11.40%13.77%9.76%9.02%9.49%11.40%9.45%8.79%10.17%
STAG
STAG Industrial, Inc.
3.24%4.05%4.38%3.74%4.52%3.02%4.60%4.53%5.71%5.14%5.82%7.40%

Financials

STAG vs. HTGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between STAG Industrial, Inc. and Hercules Capital, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
224.21M
123.49M
(STAG) Total Revenue
(HTGC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

STAG vs. HTGC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between STAG Industrial, Inc. and Hercules Capital, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
86.0%
Portfolio components
STAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, STAG Industrial, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 224.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

HTGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hercules Capital, Inc. reported a gross profit of 106.20M and revenue of 123.49M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.0%.

STAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, STAG Industrial, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.32M and revenue of 224.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.6%.

HTGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hercules Capital, Inc. reported an operating income of 65.43M and revenue of 123.49M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.0%.

STAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, STAG Industrial, Inc. reported a net income of 61.96M and revenue of 224.21M, resulting in a net margin of 27.6%.

HTGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hercules Capital, Inc. reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 123.49M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


STAG and HTGC have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HTGC has higher volatility (5.93%) compared to STAG (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STAG dropped -45.08% vs HTGC's -68.21%.

STAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STAG and HTGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer